1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04839.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Popliteal Entrapment Syndrome

Abstract: Background: Classic popliteal artery entrapment is caused by the abnormal relationship between the popliteal artery and the medial head of the gastrocnemius, resulting in repetitive arterial compression and trauma. There is, however, a distinct subset of calf claudicants who have an anatomically normal popliteal fossa but can occlude the popliteal artery by repetitive vigorous exercise which involves active plantar flexion with or without extension at the knee joint. Methods: Eight patients who led a vigorous … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional popliteal artery entrapment was reported by nine of 30 studies, and this subset comprised a median 23% of entrapments (range, 6.25%-87.5%). 22,25,29,40,43,44,47,49,51 Of the remaining 21 studies, 14 provided sufficient detail about anatomic types to conclude that functional entrapment was not present in any of the reported patients. Although the most commonly used definition of functional popliteal entrapment was that proposed by Rignault et al 66 (compression due to muscular hypertrophy), two other interpretations of functional popliteal entrapment were encountered.…”
Section: Articles Retrieved From Electronic Search N=291mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Functional popliteal artery entrapment was reported by nine of 30 studies, and this subset comprised a median 23% of entrapments (range, 6.25%-87.5%). 22,25,29,40,43,44,47,49,51 Of the remaining 21 studies, 14 provided sufficient detail about anatomic types to conclude that functional entrapment was not present in any of the reported patients. Although the most commonly used definition of functional popliteal entrapment was that proposed by Rignault et al 66 (compression due to muscular hypertrophy), two other interpretations of functional popliteal entrapment were encountered.…”
Section: Articles Retrieved From Electronic Search N=291mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…They were much younger and also fit the same activity profile that characterizes individuals with CRECS. 10,11 The major difference between the functional and anatomic entrapment syndrome was the absence of musculotendinous anomalies or vascular complications and the proportion of women affected (25 of 30 [83%]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence is unknown although this group is felt to be far more common than anatomical PAES [5,6,9]. The progression of disease is also unknown but it may be that these patients develop arterial injury more gradually with onset of more significant symptoms later in life.…”
Section: Muscle Variation In the Popliteal Fossa: The 4 Groups And Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymptomatic occluders tend to occlude their popliteal artery bilaterally [4]. Active knee extension and ankle plantarflexion seems to be the usual position that will provoke occlusion [4,5]. Given the incidence of occlusion in healthy individuals, reliance solely on radiologic demonstration of vascular occlusion for diagnosis of PAES in symptomatic patients is likely to yield a significant number of falsepositive results [3,6].…”
Section: Muscle Variation In the Popliteal Fossa: The 4 Groups And Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation