Abstract. The existence of transoorters for bile acidsIntroduction (BA) in liver and intestine has been well documented, but information is still needed as to their respective transport capacity. In the present investigation, we compared the hepatic and intestinal transport rates for BA, using perfused livers and intestines. The livers and intestines were separately perfused and doseresponse curves (0.25-10 mM) for tauroursodeoxycholate, taurocholate and taurodeoxycholate were obtained. The intestinal and mesenteric concentration and bile acid pattern were also evaluated in six non-fasting rabbits. Taurocholic, tauroursodeoxycholic and taurodeoxycholic acid ileal absorption showed saturation kinetics in the intestine as in the liver; the maximal uptake velocity for each bile acid in the liver was tenfold higher than the respective maximal transport velocity in the intestine; the Km values obtained in the liver were of the same order of magnitude, i.e. in the millimolar range. Taurocholic, tauroursodeoxycholic and taurodeoxycholic acid transport differences in the liver paralleled those in the intestine. Although the intestine was not homogeneously filled, the bile acid concentration in the ileal content fell into the range of the Km for the three studied bile acids, while the portal blood total bile acid concentration was inferior to the observed Kms of liver uptake. Therefore, both the hepatic and intestinal systems do not operate at their maximal transport rates at the prevailing concentrations in portal blood and luminal content, and the hepatic transport occurs at its highest efficiency (below the Km values) in physiological conditions. Both the liver and the intestine have been considered as main steps in the conservation of the enterohepatic circulation (EHC) of bile acids [l]. In the liver, the transport from the portal blood into bile requires distinct systems for uptake [2] and export across the apical membrane [3]. Also, different systems for transport across the basolateral and apical membrane [4] of intestinal cells operate. Therefore, the overall rate of bile acids (BA) extraction is the resultant of many processes. The kinetic parameters of the hepatic uptake of bile acids have been measured [5,6] and several systems have been identified and described in the liver [7-1 I], while an active absorption system for BA localized in the terminal ileum has been identified [12-191. It has been pointed out that besides active absorption in the ileum, passive diffusion in the jejunum helps maintain the EHC of BA [20]. Recent studies from our laboratory [21], moreover, have stressed the relative contribution of the active and passive route in the intestinal absorption of BA. These studies demonstrated that the passive component is limited mostly to dihydroxy unconjugated BA, while the transfer rates of conjugated bile acids from the lumen to the intestinal blood are largely dependent on active processes. Thus, in normal physiological conditions, where little amounts of unconjugated BA are present in the intes...