2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0303-7207(03)00123-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional relationship of serine 90 phosphorylation and the surrounding putative salt bridge in bovine prolactin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree well with our own findings here and show that, with the appropriate neighboring residues, phosphorylation in α-helices can be highly stabilizing. In contrast, Brooks and coworkers ( 41 ) showed how phosphorylation of a serine residue in bovine prolactin could destabilize a modeled α-helix and result in reduced activity. Their supposition was that phosphorylation of Ser90 would place a phosphate group in a steric clash with an already stabilizing, highly conserved, salt bridge between the neighboring Arg89 and Asp93 residues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These results agree well with our own findings here and show that, with the appropriate neighboring residues, phosphorylation in α-helices can be highly stabilizing. In contrast, Brooks and coworkers ( 41 ) showed how phosphorylation of a serine residue in bovine prolactin could destabilize a modeled α-helix and result in reduced activity. Their supposition was that phosphorylation of Ser90 would place a phosphate group in a steric clash with an already stabilizing, highly conserved, salt bridge between the neighboring Arg89 and Asp93 residues.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One possibility is pH‐dependent destabilization of the secondary hydrophobic bundle at the upper ends of the long loops indirectly alters the structure or stability of the short helix at the other end of the loops, known to play a critical role in receptor recognition. In fact, we feel that such a mechanism appears likely for the lowering of receptor‐binding affinity for bovine PRL phosphorylated at S90,21, 22 given its buried position within this secondary hydrophobic core and its intimate relationship with H59 (assuming the bovine and human PRL tertiary structures are sufficiently similar). Alternatively, local destabilization and the associated increased mobility of the long loops in hPRL may increase susceptibility to enzymatic proteolysis, either as part of the mechanism for generation of the potently antiangiogenic 16 kDa N‐terminal fragment of hPRL23, 24 or during lysosomal degradation of the hormone after endocytosis 25…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1). The Pro 96 and Gly 131 of mature cmPRL1 were residues found to be well conserved among all GH/PRL family members; these residues are considered to be important in the binding of molecules to their receptors (Goffin et al, 1996;Schenck et al, 2003).…”
Section: -1 Cloningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the C-terminal region, in particular the residues between Cys 173 and Cys 190 (positions in mature cmPRL1) is well conserved among all examined GH/PRL family molecules. In cmPRL1, Pro 96 and Gly 131 , the residues which significantly contribute to the receptor binding ability of the molecules (Goffin et al, 1996;Schenck et al, 2003), were conserved between known PRL1s. Although the C-termini of cmPRL1 and known PRL1 proteins terminate with the conserved Cys residue, the cmGH has the extension of two amino acid residues after Cys 182 in its C-terminal end; such an extension of C-terminal residues is a feature of known GHs and SLs.…”
Section: -2 Evolution Of Gh/prl Familymentioning
confidence: 99%