P Pu ur rp po os se e: : The goal of this study was to analyze the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), with and without a lung recruitment maneuver, on dead space.M Me et th ho od ds s: : 16 anesthetized patients were sequentially studied in three steps: 1) without PEEP (ZEEP), 2) with 5 cm H 2 O of PEEP and 3) with 5 cm H 2 O of PEEP after an alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS). Ventilation was maintained constant. The single breath test of CO 2 (SBT-CO 2 ), arterial oxygenation, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory compliance were recorded every 30 min.R Re es su ul lt ts s: : Physiological dead space to tidal volume decreased after ARS (0.45 ± 0.01) compared with ZEEP (0.50 ± 0.07, P < 0.05) and PEEP (0.51 ± 0.06, P < 0.05). The elimination of CO 2 per breath increased during PEEP (25 ± 3.3 mL·min -1 ) and ARS (27 ± 3.2 mL·min -1 ) compared to ZEEP (23 ± 2.6 mL·min -1 , P < 0.05), although ARS showed larger values than PEEP (P < 0.05). Pa-etCO 2 difference was lower after recruitment (0.9 ± 0.5 kPa, P < 0.05) compared to ZEEP (1.1 ± 0.5 kPa) and PEEP (1.2 ± 0.5 kPa).Slope II increased after ARS (63 ± 11%/L, P < 0.05) compared with ZEEP (46 ± 7.7%/L) and PEEP (56 ± 10%/L). Slope III decreased significantly after recruitment (0.13 ± 0.07 1/L) compared with ZEEP (0.21 ± 0.11 1/L) and PEEP (0.18 ± 0.10 1/L). The angle between slope II and III decreased only after ARS. After lung recruitment, PaO 2 , EELV, and compliance increased significantly compared with ZEEP and PEEP.