2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional response of Neoseiulus californicus preying on Tetranychus urticae is affected by prey quality and host-plant acclimation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this investigation N. californicus female showed Type II functional response to adult females and type I to other stages of T. urticae at five different temperatures. Phytoseiid mites frequently exhibit the Type II functional response, which has been observed in N. californicus ( Ahn, Kim & Lee, 2010 ; Kuştutan & Cakmak, 2009 ; Döker & Kazak, 2016 ; Merlin et al, 2022 ) as well as other phytoseiid species such as A. longispinosus (Evans) ( Zhang et al, 1998 ), Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks) ( Poletti, Maia & Omoto, 2007 ), Chileseius camposi Gonzalez & Schuster ( Sepúlveda & Carrillo, 2008 ), Galendromus occidentalis (Nesbitt) ( Xiao & Fadamiro, 2010 ), Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans) ( Kasap & Atlihan, 2011 ), Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese) ( Fantinou et al, 2012 ), N. longispinosus ( Rahman et al, 2012 ), Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot ( Seiedy et al, 2012 ), Galendromus flumenis ( Ganjisaffar & Perring, 2015 ), Cydnoseius negevi ( Alatawi et al, 2018 ), and Euseius concordis ( da Silveira et al, 2020 ). If the consumption rate increases linearly with the quantity of food up to a certain threshold at which it stabilises, the functional response is said to be type I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this investigation N. californicus female showed Type II functional response to adult females and type I to other stages of T. urticae at five different temperatures. Phytoseiid mites frequently exhibit the Type II functional response, which has been observed in N. californicus ( Ahn, Kim & Lee, 2010 ; Kuştutan & Cakmak, 2009 ; Döker & Kazak, 2016 ; Merlin et al, 2022 ) as well as other phytoseiid species such as A. longispinosus (Evans) ( Zhang et al, 1998 ), Phytoseiulus macropilis (Banks) ( Poletti, Maia & Omoto, 2007 ), Chileseius camposi Gonzalez & Schuster ( Sepúlveda & Carrillo, 2008 ), Galendromus occidentalis (Nesbitt) ( Xiao & Fadamiro, 2010 ), Kampimodromus aberrans (Oudemans) ( Kasap & Atlihan, 2011 ), Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese) ( Fantinou et al, 2012 ), N. longispinosus ( Rahman et al, 2012 ), Phytoseiulus persimilis Athias-Henriot ( Seiedy et al, 2012 ), Galendromus flumenis ( Ganjisaffar & Perring, 2015 ), Cydnoseius negevi ( Alatawi et al, 2018 ), and Euseius concordis ( da Silveira et al, 2020 ). If the consumption rate increases linearly with the quantity of food up to a certain threshold at which it stabilises, the functional response is said to be type I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although Type II functional responses are common in host–parasitoid systems [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] and Type III is not prevalent in parasitic insects [ 34 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ], the form of the functional response on its own does not determine the success or failure of parasitoids in biological control [ 30 ]. Other factors that influence the efficiency of natural enemies in pest control include prey growth rates, behaviors, and distribution [ 42 , 43 , 44 ], as well as temperature [ 16 ] and host plant [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recorded in several species, such as Euseius finlandicus and Amblyseius andersoni preying on Panonychus ulmi larvae and adult females (Koveos & Broufas, 2000), Euseius scutalis preying on T. urticae and Eutetranychus orientalis (Acari: Tetranychidae; Stathakis et al, 2021); Amblyseius swirskii preying on Eotetranychus frosti (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Cenopalpus irani (Acari: Tenuipalpidae) (Bazgir et al, 2020); Iphiseius degenerans preying on T. urticae and E. orientalis (Fantinou et al, 2012). However, it should be noted that predatory arthropods' feeding may be affected by plant species and/or cultivars characteristics for example via the impediment of their movement or indirectly via the quality of their prey (e.g., Cédola et al, 2001;Messina & Hanks, 1998;Merlin et al, 2022;Paspati et al, 2021), indicating that functional responses should be also evaluated in several environmental scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%