2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Retinal Changes Measured by Microperimetry in Standard-Fluence vs Low-Fluence Photodynamic Therapy in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MP-1 microperimeter allows automated functional analysis of the macula, associated with real-time correction of eye movements. Studies with microperimetry in eyes with CSC show significantly lower RS not only at the central but also in the paracentral area of the macula [29][30][31][32]. Furthermore, Ozdemir et al [33] found that eyes with resolved CSC had a statistically significant reduced central RS compared with controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The MP-1 microperimeter allows automated functional analysis of the macula, associated with real-time correction of eye movements. Studies with microperimetry in eyes with CSC show significantly lower RS not only at the central but also in the paracentral area of the macula [29][30][31][32]. Furthermore, Ozdemir et al [33] found that eyes with resolved CSC had a statistically significant reduced central RS compared with controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reibaldi et al, [21] evaluated low-fluence PDT (25J/cm 2 ) versus standard fluence (50J/cm 2 ) and found improvement in bestcorrected VA at 12 months in both groups with resorption of SRF in a significant number of eyes. However, these authors also noted significant choriocapillaris nonperfusion in 44% of eyes treated with standard-fluence PDT versus 0% in those treated with reduced-fluence PDT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, treatment success is limited by complications, including RPE atrophy and tears, choroidal neovascularization, and ischemia [18]. In an effort to minimize complications, PDT has been used at half the regular dose, fluence, or both [19][20][21][22][23]. This has been shown to reduce SRF doi: 10.7243/2055-2408-1-2 and improve visual acuity (VA) and retinal sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,[48][49][50][51][52] Reduced fluence vPDT therapy uses a vPDT laser fluence of 25 J/cm 2 (300 mW/cm 2 for 83 s). 14,15,53,54 There is limited evidence to compare these different vPDT protocols for CSC in the absence of randomised controlled trials. 44,[55][56][57][58] The current approach to management of CSC is largely empirical.…”
Section: Central Serous Chorioretinopathymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is limited evidence to determine the optimum vPDT therapy parameters for different chorioretinal conditions. [12][13][14][15] Neovascular age-related macular degeneration vPDT therapy was developed to treat neovascular AMD with subfoveal CNV. Phase I/II clinical studies demonstrated that a single treatment achieved effective CNV closure, but reperfusion typically occurred after 6-12 weeks.…”
Section: Vpdt Treatment Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%