2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.26.437258
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional selectivity for social interaction perception in the human superior temporal sulcus during natural viewing

Abstract: Recognizing others' social interactions is a crucial human ability. Using simple stimuli, previous studies have shown that social interactions are processed in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). However, it remains unknown to what extent social interaction selectivity is observed for real world stimuli where social interactions covary with other perceptual and social information, such as faces, voices, and theory of mind. By using a naturalistic fMRI movie paradigm and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(188 reference statements)
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Linear mapping models estimate weights for individual features, making the mapping more interpretable (e.g., Anderson et al, 2017;Lee Masson & Isik, 2021;Naselaris et al, 2011;Sudre et al, 2012;cf. Haufe et al, 2014;Kriegeskorte & Douglas, 2019).…”
Section: The Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. Linear mapping models estimate weights for individual features, making the mapping more interpretable (e.g., Anderson et al, 2017;Lee Masson & Isik, 2021;Naselaris et al, 2011;Sudre et al, 2012;cf. Haufe et al, 2014;Kriegeskorte & Douglas, 2019).…”
Section: The Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One such study presented short video clips of computer animations depicting a range of social (e.g., faces, bodies and social interactions) and non-social (e.g., objects, houses and non-social interactions) features, finding that although the posterior temporal cortex in general responded more to social compared to non-social stimuli, the pSTS showed a significant increase in response for all eight identified social features, including social interaction (Lahnakoski et al, 2012). Taking this one step further, two recent studies have analysed data collected while participants viewed TV episodes or excerpts from movies (Masson & Isik, 2021; Wagner et al, 2016). Wagner et al (2016) found that medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) was most involved in processing naturalistic social interactions and speculated that this was because social interactions trigger spontaneous mentalising processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, recent work suggests that observed interactions are perceived and processed in a way that extends beyond the sum of perceiving multiple individuals (Abassi & Papeo, 2020, 2021; Bellot et al, 2021; Isik et al, 2017; Masson & Isik, 2021; Walbrin et al, 2018; Walbrin & Koldewyn, 2019). Studies focused on dynamic interactions (Isik et al, 2017; Masson & Isik, 2021; Walbrin et al, 2018) have highlighted a region of the posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) as being selectively involved in the perception of observed social interactions. Notably, this region is engaged even by stimuli that contain minimal or even no realistic human visual features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the role of the superior temporal sulcus in processing dynamic social information, Lahnakoski et al. , 2012 ; Lee Masson and Isik, 2021 ). It has also methodologically benefitted neuroimaging research by providing more attentionally engaging experiences for participants, which is especially useful for studying children and developing brains ( Vanderwal et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%