2006
DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional source separation from magnetoencephalographic signals

Abstract: We propose a novel cerebral source extraction method (functional source separation, FSS) starting from extra-cephalic magnetoencephalographic (MEG) signals in humans. It is obtained by adding a functional constraint to the cost function of a basic independent component analysis (ICA) model, defined according to the specific experiment under study, and removing the orthogonality constraint, (i.e., in a single-unit approach, skipping decorrelation of each new component from the subspace generated by the componen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, since prior information on the sources may also be described by a nondifferentiable function, the new contrast function F is optimized by means of simulated annealing. This procedure does not require the use of derivatives and allows to achieve global optimization, while gradient-based algorithms usually employed in ICA only guarantee local optimization (Barbati et al, 2006). To identify the specific contribution of different neuronal sources (which are assumed to be nonindependent/noncorrelated), the FSS source-specific functional constraints are applied to the original data.…”
Section: Data Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, since prior information on the sources may also be described by a nondifferentiable function, the new contrast function F is optimized by means of simulated annealing. This procedure does not require the use of derivatives and allows to achieve global optimization, while gradient-based algorithms usually employed in ICA only guarantee local optimization (Barbati et al, 2006). To identify the specific contribution of different neuronal sources (which are assumed to be nonindependent/noncorrelated), the FSS source-specific functional constraints are applied to the original data.…”
Section: Data Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicability of ICA to ERP analyses has been shown repeatedly in a context in which it is possible to attribute a physiological meaning to one or more components (Makeig et al 2002;Debener et al 2004), for artifacts detection (Vigario 1997) and more generally for EEG pattern recognition and classification (Naeem et al 2006;De Lucia et al 2008). Numerous other approaches have been developed in the area of blind source separation (Belouchrani et al 1997;Tang et al 2005; Barbati et al 2006), and several methods at the level of single waveforms either based on assuming stationary stereotypic wave shapes (Knuth et al 2006) or on filtering and de-noising (Quiroga and Garcia 2003;Georgiadis et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior MEG based BCI studies have been conducted based on the sensor domain, focusing mainly on the source identification problem [41][42][43]. In [44], a source based MEG analysis was proposed using a novel blind source separation method called functional source separation (FSS) to identify sources of activation and source time courses for potential BCI use.…”
Section: Synthetic Aperture Magnetometry (Sam) and Source Space Bcimentioning
confidence: 99%