2021
DOI: 10.1113/jp281933
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional stability of CFTR depends on tight binding of ATP at its degenerate ATP‐binding site

Abstract: support-information-section).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7l ). Dissociation of ATP from both sites probably leads to the reversible rundown of CFTR currents that occurs after prolonged exposure to nucleotide-free solutions 29 .…”
Section: Dimerization Persists Through Cycles Of Hydrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7l ). Dissociation of ATP from both sites probably leads to the reversible rundown of CFTR currents that occurs after prolonged exposure to nucleotide-free solutions 29 .…”
Section: Dimerization Persists Through Cycles Of Hydrolysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The twelve transmembrane spans (TM) from the MSDs combine to form a pore allowing anions like chloride, bicarbonate but also iodide, to cross the PM. Only ATP binding site 2 has retained its ability to hydrolyze ATP, while site 1 was proposed to modulate the stability of CFTR function [ 28 ]. Dissociation of ADP in the NBD dimer after ATP hydrolysis at site 2 closes the channel (reviewed in [ 29 ]).…”
Section: One Size Does Not Fit Allmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since these Lys and Gly are located at helix ends and not in loops, noisy fluctuations in the distance between their Cα atoms were prevented. These positions were identified by aligning the query NBDs to a reference NBD (Pgp NBD1 from 6c0v) using the TM-align algorithm and not by simple sequence search, since there are many ABC proteins with degenerate, non-conserved ATP-binding sites (e.g., CFTR/ABCC7 possesses a degenerate signature motif [ 45 , 46 ]). The distribution of the distances between Walker A and signature calculated for all structures ( Figure 3 ) indicated a cutoff value of 14 Å for distinguishing bottom-closed and bottom-open conformations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%