2022
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.2c01799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Studies on an Indel Loop between the Subtypes of meso-Diaminopimelate Dehydrogenase

Abstract: Divergent evolution exists in the meso-diaminopimelate dehydrogenase (meso-DAPDH) family. Taking meso-DAPDH from Corynebacterium glutamicium ATCC13032 (CgDAPDH) and Symbiobacterium thermophilum IAM14863 (StDAPDH) as examples, the two subtypes differ in terms of their amination ability toward 2-keto acids. The significant structural difference between these two subtypes is an indel loop containing 16 amino acid residues, which exists in CgDAPDH. However, the function of the indel loop has still not been reporte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each paradigm has produced fundamental insights into how nature produces life and what goes wrong in disease, but each often overlooks mutations beyond simple missense substitutions. Recent work has underscored how essential other types of mutations are to evolutionary novelty and adaptation, as well as their utility for understanding diseases and protein engineering [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In addition to missense mutations, we must consider frameshifts, recombination, splice variations, and insertions and deletions to evaluate how mutations change proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each paradigm has produced fundamental insights into how nature produces life and what goes wrong in disease, but each often overlooks mutations beyond simple missense substitutions. Recent work has underscored how essential other types of mutations are to evolutionary novelty and adaptation, as well as their utility for understanding diseases and protein engineering [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In addition to missense mutations, we must consider frameshifts, recombination, splice variations, and insertions and deletions to evaluate how mutations change proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each paradigm has produced fundamental insights into how nature produces life and what goes wrong in disease, but each often overlooks mutations beyond simple substitutions. Recent work has underscored how essential other types of mutations are to evolutionary novelty and adaptation, as well as their utility for understanding diseases and protein engineering (Seuma, Lehner, and Bolognesi 2022; Savino, Desmet, and Franceus 2022; Q. Ma et al 2022; Park and Hahn 2021; Z.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All bonds were constrained by the LINCS algorithm, and the total simulation time was 100 ns; conformations were saved every 10 ps. After the simulation was completed, the simulated trajectories were analyzed using VMD . The binding free energies were evaluated via the Molecular Mechanical Poisson–Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA) calculations …”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the simulation was completed, the simulated trajectories were analyzed using VMD. 29 The binding free energies were evaluated via the Molecular Mechanical Poisson−Boltzmann Surface Area (MM-PBSA) calculations. 30 2.11.…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%