Immunological memory, defined as more efficient immune responses on antigen reexposure, can last for decades. The current paradigm is that memory is maintained by antigen-experienced ''memory T cells'' that can be long-lived quiescent or dividing. The contribution of T cell division to memory maintenance is poorly known and has important clinical implications. In this study, we directly addressed the role of dividing T cells in immunological memory maintenance by evaluating the consequences of their elimination. The specific ablation of dividing T cells was obtained by administration of ganciclovir to immune mice expressing the herpes simplex type 1 thymidine kinase suicide gene in T cells. We show that depletion of dividing T cells for 5 or 2 weeks suffices to abolish in vitro and in vivo memory responses against the male H-Y transplantation alloantigen or against lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus antigens, respectively. Similar results were obtained after the nonspecific elimination of all dividing cells by using hydroxyurea, a cytostatic toxic agent commonly used for cancer chemotherapy. This immune amnesia occurred in otherwise immunocompetent mice and despite the persistence of functional quiescent T cells displaying a ''memory'' phenotype. Thus, division of antigen-experienced T cells is an absolute requirement for immunological memory maintenance and the current concept of memory T cells is challenged.I mmunological memory is one of the main features of adaptative immunity. It is characterized by a more rapid and intense immune response on reexposure to an immunogen. In responses against pathogens, immunological memory can translate into infection protection that can last for decades. The population dynamics of lymphocytes that ensures long-term memory maintenance in vivo and the physiological consequences of this dynamics are poorly understood. In particular, the respective contributions of long-lived quiescent vs. dividing T cells for immunological memory maintenance remain to be investigated.The current paradigm is that ''memory T cells'' support immunological memory. Tentative identification of these cells has been based on cell surface markers whose high ( hi ) or low ( lo ) expression levels are modulated on activation (1, 2). Likewise in mice, T cells are commonly subdivided into naive (CD44 lo -CD45RB hi -CD62L hi ), effector (CD44 hi -CD45RB lo/hi -CD62L lo ), and memory subsets (CD44 hi -CD45RB lo -CD62L lo ). However, this immunophenotypic classification is simplistic: (i) the memory T cell phenotype appears quite heterogeneous (3), different for CD4 ϩ and CD8 ϩ T cells, comprising at least two subsets referred to as ''effector memory '' and ''central memory'' T cells (4-6); (ii) phenotypic changes from naive to memory͞effector type may be a stigmata of antigen (Ag) activation rather than a hallmark of memory͞effector function; (iii) at least some of these phenotypic changes are reversible (3, 7); (iv) homeostatic proliferation can induce naive T cells to acquire the memory͞ effector phenotype...