1975
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-4039(00)91259-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional subunits in the nucleic acid bases uracil and thymine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
4
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 is parallelled by the calculations (Table 2), which also predict a small decrease in the splitting.…”
Section: Diketonessupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 is parallelled by the calculations (Table 2), which also predict a small decrease in the splitting.…”
Section: Diketonessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…A number of carbonyls and dicarbonyls have been investigated by ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) (1,2), although few ydicarbonyls have been studied except for benzoquinone and its substituted derivatives (3)(4)(5)(6). For most dicarbonyl compounds, interest arises in the mechanism of the interaction between the two carbonyl groups, and whether it occurs throughspace or through-bond (2,3,(7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More highly resolved experimental information about the occupied valence orbitals of biological purines will greatly facilitate an understanding of their ground-state electronic structure. In recent studies of biological pyrimidines it has been found that UV photoelectron spectroscopy can provide this information (11)(12)(13). The present study of adenine, 9-methyladenine, and 6-methylaminopurine is a detailed photoelectron examination of biological purines.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Presumably geometric restrictions prevent optimum interaction of n, and a in the latter 'A recent study (22) has shown that the n,-r and n, f r levels in 2-methyl-2-azabicyclo[3.2.l]octa-3-ene are separated by 2.77 eV. It is difficult to compare this separation with those found here because the substitution of the double-bond differs.…”
Section: I2mentioning
confidence: 54%