2019
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functional Traits of Trees From Dry Deciduous “Forests” of Southern India Suggest Seasonal Drought and Fire Are Important Drivers

Abstract: Two dominant biomes that occur across the southern Indian peninsula are dry deciduous "forests" and evergreen forests, with the former occurring in drier regions and the latter in wetter regions, sometimes in close proximity to each other. Here we compare stem and leaf traits of trees from multiple sites across these biomes to show that dry deciduous "forest" species have, on average, lower height: diameter ratios, lower specific leaf areas, higher wood densities and higher relative bark thickness, than evergr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These patterns are in line with the functional equilibrium hypothesis and confirm previous studies on above‐ground trait differences between savanna and forest species (e.g. Veenendaal et al , ; Hoffmann & Franco, ; Poorter et al , ; Ratnam et al , ). These patterns also translate to root biomass investment (RMF), where species in the closed or closing canopy forest clusters allocate less biomass to roots than the species in the open canopy savanna clusters (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These patterns are in line with the functional equilibrium hypothesis and confirm previous studies on above‐ground trait differences between savanna and forest species (e.g. Veenendaal et al , ; Hoffmann & Franco, ; Poorter et al , ; Ratnam et al , ). These patterns also translate to root biomass investment (RMF), where species in the closed or closing canopy forest clusters allocate less biomass to roots than the species in the open canopy savanna clusters (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…, Ratnam et al. ). Genus‐level average wood densities were used in the absence of species‐level estimates (Chave et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, drier regions are characterized by less dense forests, and exhibit lower VOD values that are distributed in a reduced range, with respect to wetter regions where rainforests occur. AGB is lower in open forests, and dry forest types are known to have lower height, diameter ratios, lower specific leaf areas, higher wood densities, and higher relative bark thickness, than evergreen forest species (Ratnam et al, 2019). Thus, the sparser canopy coverage plus these specific traits cause a lower VOD response in drier areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the high correlation values observed for GPP max , LUE, and then WUE, can be attributed to VOD sensitivity to biomass which is related to forestand water-related attributes. Instead, the BW measurements derived with eddy covariance techniques are known to be prone to uncertainty over forested lands, due to low wind speed over forests and the resulting occasional stalling of anemometers (Spittlehouse & Black, 1980 forest types are known to have lower height, diameter ratios, lower specific leaf areas, higher wood densities, and higher relative bark thickness, than evergreen forest species (Ratnam et al, 2019). Thus, the sparser canopy coverage plus these specific traits cause a lower VOD response in drier areas.…”
Section: Spatial Correlations and Gpp Max And Lue Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%