2019
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201901285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functionalization of Electrospun Membranes with Polyelectrolytes for Separation of Oil‐In‐Water Emulsions

Abstract: Membrane fouling in microfiltration of oil-in-water emulsions is influenced by electrostatic interaction between the membrane and surfactant-stabilized emulsions. A method to alter the electrostatic properties of electrospun fiber membranes using layer-by-layer (LbL) polyelectrolyte assembly has been developed to improve fouling resistance. Plasma pre-treatment and successive depositions of polycations and polyanions from solutions are shown to alter the surface charge of electrospun polyamide membranes, while… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With a feed containing 5 wt % dodecane, the highest permeate flux we achieved was on the order of 0.1 LMH. This permeate flux is low compared to that observed with hydrophilic membranes, which is generally on the order of 10 LMH for electrospun membranes after a few hours of filtration. , However, the permeate for the LIM is the dispersed phase (oil), whereas it is the continuous phase (water) in the case of hydrophilic membranes. In order to compare the two cases, we employ the metric shown in eq where J d * is the adjusted permeate flux of the dispersed phase, J d is the measured permeate flux of the dispersed phase, and V c / V d is the volume ratio of the continuous phase to the dispersed phase in the feed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With a feed containing 5 wt % dodecane, the highest permeate flux we achieved was on the order of 0.1 LMH. This permeate flux is low compared to that observed with hydrophilic membranes, which is generally on the order of 10 LMH for electrospun membranes after a few hours of filtration. , However, the permeate for the LIM is the dispersed phase (oil), whereas it is the continuous phase (water) in the case of hydrophilic membranes. In order to compare the two cases, we employ the metric shown in eq where J d * is the adjusted permeate flux of the dispersed phase, J d is the measured permeate flux of the dispersed phase, and V c / V d is the volume ratio of the continuous phase to the dispersed phase in the feed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…When fouling occurs, removal of the foulants typically involves the use of harsh chemicals, which increases the overall cost of membrane operation and raises environmental concerns . Conventional methods to address fouling generally work under the principle of reducing favorable interaction between the foulant and the membrane so that the accumulation of foulants occurs more slowly (“fouling resistance”) , or the accumulated foulants can be removed more easily (“membrane regeneration”). , These techniques mitigate the effect of fouling but never completely eliminate it, so the detrimental effects of foulant removal from the membrane must still be dealt with. Therefore, we are motivated to find methods to address fouling that are fundamentally different from the conventional ones, in the hope that fouling can be eliminated completely.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important nanofiber application is in filtration membranes. 73 The nanofiber morphology and surface properties affect their filtration efficiency. The nanofibers have formed efficient filtration media for nanometer sized nanoparticles due to high surface cohesion and high surface area to volume ratio.…”
Section: Applications Of Electrospun Polymeric Nanocompositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Membrane separation is considered as one of the most promising methods for oily wastewater treatment, especially for oil/water (O/W) emulsion separation with an oil droplets size smaller than 20 µm [16,17]. Compared with traditional methods, membrane separation has a higher oil removal efficiency, a more compact design, and a smaller footprint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%