“…[ 87–101 ] The advantages of MOFs arose from their superiority in surface modification, [ 102–105 ] effective pore modulation [ 106–110 ] and low‐ to moderate‐temperature thermal activation, [ 111–114 ] which kept it upper hand for practical deployment toward this challenging separation direction over other conventional previously developed porous materials. These advantages of MOFs sparked interest in a vast range of potential applications involving gas storage and separation, [ 10,115–124 ] proton conductivity, [ 2,125–135 ] sensing, [ 136–142 ] luminescence, [ 143,144 ] heterogeneous catalysis, [ 145–152 ] and so on. [ 153–166 ] Specifically, the investigation of MOFs toward flue gas (15% CO 2 and 85% N 2 ) and biogas (50% CO 2 and 50% CH 4 ) mixture separation has overgrown in recent years ( Figure ) over other potential application domains, and tremendous efforts have already been devoted to the development of MOFs to comprehend a better trade‐off between high CO 2 sorption capacity and separation selectivity.…”