Functionally Enigmatic Genes: A Case Study of the Brain Ignorome

Abstract

What proportion of genes with intense and selective expression in specific tissues, cells, or systems are still almost completely uncharacterized with respect to biological function? In what ways do these functionally enigmatic genes differ from well-studied genes? To address these two questions, we devised a computational approach that defines so-called ignoromes. As proof of principle, we extracted and analyzed a large subset of genes with intense and selective expression in brain. We find that publications associated with this set are highly skewed—the top 5% of genes absorb 70% of the relevant literature. In contrast, approximately 20% of genes have essentially no neuroscience literature. Analysis of the ignorome over the past decade demonstrates that it is stubbornly persistent, and the rapid expansion of the neuroscience literature has not had the expected effect on numbers of these genes. Surprisingly, ignorome genes do not differ from well-studied genes in terms of connectivity in coexpression networks. Nor do they differ with respect to numbers of orthologs, paralogs, or protein domains. The major distinguishing characteristic between these sets of genes is date of discovery, early discovery being associated with greater research momentum—a genomic bandwagon effect. Finally we ask to what extent massive genomic, imaging, and phenotype data sets can be used to provide high-throughput functional annotation for an entire ignorome. In a majority of cases we have been able to extract and add significant information for these neglected genes. In several cases—ELMOD1, TMEM88B, and DZANK1—we have exploited sequence polymorphisms, large phenome data sets, and reverse genetic methods to evaluate the function of ignorome genes.

Genetics and Genomics of Longitudinal Lung Function Patterns in Individuals with Asthma

“…Gene-expression pathway analysis of brain tissue has implicated CSMD3 in GABAergic neuronal fate and neuronal development (47). g-Aminobutyric acid signaling is primarily responsible for maintenance of muscle tone (50), including airway smooth muscle tone (51,52).…”

Genetic Dissection of Femoral and Tibial Microarchitecture

“…Based on our survey of the literature, only 2% (36) have been previously linked to bone biology. To evaluate the remaining 98% of candidates for possible association with bone biology, we developed an efficient, comprehensive, and quantitative method that generates an objective bone score using methods similar to those described in previous work by us and others . We specifically defined a bone score that estimates the potential association of each gene to bone biology when compared against a reference set of 770 genes already well‐known to be associated with 34 bone gene ontology (GO) terms.…”

“…We define a new set of genes that have a strong likelihood of being related to bone biology, but that currently lack any relevant literature. We refer to this set as a “bone ignorome . We have merged information on the ignorome with our set of candidate genes to rank those most likely to contribute to variation in bone structure and function.…”

From Planar Cell Polarity to Ciliogenesis and Back: The Curious Tale of the PPE and CPLANE proteins

“…Indeed, one recent paper coined the term “ignorome” to describe these “unpopular” or still poorly studied genes [1]. Why some genes are more popular than others remains an open question [2], but one example of this phenomenon involves the genes controlling planar cell polarity (PCP), the polarization of cells within a plane of a tissue [3–5].…”