“…By the claim W(co) c PiC2C(co,9)) n E, ^( 0 ) c p 2 (<%(co,9)) n rjo,,. This implies p 1 (^'(a),9)) n E = ,0)) 0^ = ^( 0 N. D. Macheras and W. Strauss [14] ty (,u…”
Section: Ax B Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before stating the first theorem we mention that the product of Baire probability spaces is in general not a Baire probability space (see [2]), and the same is true for topological probability spaces (see [8]), where the situation is even much worse (see [18 and 19]). For this reason we assume in the next theorem only the Baire-ASLP for the product which is more likely satisfied than the ASLP.…”
Section: Liftings and Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [30] , 9)) n E is again an ultrafilter in E and so is ^(co) = &(co), p 2 ('^(co, 9)) n rjoc is an ultrafilter in r)^ and so is ty (9). By the claim W(co) c PiC2C(co,9)) n E, ^( 0 ) c p 2 (<%(co,9)) n rjo,,.…”
Section: Ax B Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By induction it is again sufficient to give the proof for n = 2 and for simplicity we may put i = 1. We denote by p\(co) := a^ forw = (ct) u a) 2 [23]). Since p is almost strong by assumption there exists a Q. o e E with AI(£2 0 ) = 1 such that…”
Dealing with a problem posed by Kupka we give results concerning the permanence of the almost strong lifting property (respectively of the universal strong lifting property) under finite and countable products of topological probability spaces. As a basis we prove a theorem on the existence of liftings compatible with products for general probability spaces, and in addition we use this theorem for discussing finite products of lifting topologies.
“…By the claim W(co) c PiC2C(co,9)) n E, ^( 0 ) c p 2 (<%(co,9)) n rjo,,. This implies p 1 (^'(a),9)) n E = ,0)) 0^ = ^( 0 N. D. Macheras and W. Strauss [14] ty (,u…”
Section: Ax B Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before stating the first theorem we mention that the product of Baire probability spaces is in general not a Baire probability space (see [2]), and the same is true for topological probability spaces (see [8]), where the situation is even much worse (see [18 and 19]). For this reason we assume in the next theorem only the Baire-ASLP for the product which is more likely satisfied than the ASLP.…”
Section: Liftings and Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [30] , 9)) n E is again an ultrafilter in E and so is ^(co) = &(co), p 2 ('^(co, 9)) n rjoc is an ultrafilter in r)^ and so is ty (9). By the claim W(co) c PiC2C(co,9)) n E, ^( 0 ) c p 2 (<%(co,9)) n rjo,,.…”
Section: Ax B Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By induction it is again sufficient to give the proof for n = 2 and for simplicity we may put i = 1. We denote by p\(co) := a^ forw = (ct) u a) 2 [23]). Since p is almost strong by assumption there exists a Q. o e E with AI(£2 0 ) = 1 such that…”
Dealing with a problem posed by Kupka we give results concerning the permanence of the almost strong lifting property (respectively of the universal strong lifting property) under finite and countable products of topological probability spaces. As a basis we prove a theorem on the existence of liftings compatible with products for general probability spaces, and in addition we use this theorem for discussing finite products of lifting topologies.
“…)dµ 2 . Then g ∈ C ub (X 1 ) and µ, ν, defined by µ( f ) = ( f dµ 2 )dµ 1 and ν( f ) = ( f dµ 1 )dµ 2 are in M u (X 1 × X 2 ) and µ = ν on C ub (X 1 ) ⊗ C ub (X 2 ). (1, 2)).…”
For i = (1, 2), let X i be Hausdorff uniform spaces and µ i uniform measures on X i . We determine the existence of the product uniform measure µ 1 ⊗ µ 2 on X 1 × X 2 and prove a Fubini type theorem and a continuity property. The result is extended to vector-valued uniform measures.Keywords Uniformly bounded equicontinuous sets · Tight measures · Inductive tensor product of locally convex spaces Mathematics Subject Classification (2000) 28A35 · 60B05 · 46G10 · 28C15 · 28B05
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.