2012
DOI: 10.1075/jhp.13.2.01rut
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Functions of epistolary formulae in Dutch letters from the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries

Abstract: Wray (2002) distinguishes three main functions of formulaic language relating to processing, interaction and discourse marking. In this paper, we show that Wray's analysis of the functions of formulaic language also applies to historical letter-writing in a corpus of seventeenth-and eighteenth-century Dutch letters. Discourse is marked with formulae indicating the text type or the text structure. Interaction is covered by intersubjective formulae communicating health, greetings, wishes for renewed contact, as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 in section 5 showed that the UMC proportion is in line with the overall proportion, w-forms making up 45% of all relative (pronominal) adverbs in the UMC part of subcorpus 1. 14 It may not come as a surprise that epistolary formulae such as the COMMAND constructions appear to behave slightly more conservatively than relative clauses in general, since formulae were probably memorized as a whole, and inserted into discourse as prefabricated strings of words (Rutten and van der Wal 2012). Numbers are fairly small here, but still COMMAND constructions seem to be conservative vis-à-vis the change in progress.…”
Section: Constructional Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Figure 1 in section 5 showed that the UMC proportion is in line with the overall proportion, w-forms making up 45% of all relative (pronominal) adverbs in the UMC part of subcorpus 1. 14 It may not come as a surprise that epistolary formulae such as the COMMAND constructions appear to behave slightly more conservatively than relative clauses in general, since formulae were probably memorized as a whole, and inserted into discourse as prefabricated strings of words (Rutten and van der Wal 2012). Numbers are fairly small here, but still COMMAND constructions seem to be conservative vis-à-vis the change in progress.…”
Section: Constructional Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In particular, discourse-based, (socio)pragmatic and historical pragmatic approaches have started breaking new ground in the fields of extraterritorial varieties and migrant languages, offering a new perspective on their variation and development (e.g. Dossena 2012b; Laitinen and Nordlund 2012;Rutten and van der Wal 2012;van der Wal and Rutten 2013). One of the reasons for this development is that, recently, epistolary data for a range of languages have been studied for the first time, e.g.…”
Section: Historical Correspondence: Recent Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Het gebruik van de gezondheidsformules hebben we onderzocht in corpora die uitsluitend uit autografen bestaan (Rutten & Van der Wal 2012). Daarbij blijkt dat ze in een groot aantal zeventiende-eeuwse brieven voorkomen (86%), zowel in brieven van mannen als in die van vrouwen.…”
Section: Formulair Taalgebruikunclassified
“…Vrouwen gebruiken dus uitvoeriger gezondheidsformules dan mannen. Die onderscheidingen zijn ook toepasbaar op formulair taalgebruik in zeventiende-en achttiende-eeuwse Nederlandse brieven (Rutten & Van der Wal 2012). De hoofdformule fris en gezond kwam bij de lage en lage middenklasse in 46% van de brieven voor en bij de hoge middenklasse en hoge klasse in minder dan 10% van de brieven.…”
Section: Formulair Taalgebruikunclassified