The purpose of this study is to explore academicians' perceptions and experiences about the public high-stakes Foreign Language Test(s) (YDS, formerly UDS, KPDS, and their counterparts in different times and contexts) used to measure foreign language proficiency in Turkey. For this purpose, data were collected from academicians with different titles, genders, and ages through a survey in which they were asked to complete the sentence "The FLT is like __________ for me because __________" with a one-or-two-word metaphor and a short sentence explaining their reason for the metaphor they choose. Of the over 2600 academicians the survey forms were sent to through an e-mail, 110 filled-in the forms. The data obtained were analyzed verbally and 34 different metaphors were collected. After the analysis of the metaphors, it was drawn that academicians generally have negative feelings and experiences about the foreign language test(s).
Keywords: Foreign Language Test, Metaphor, Academicians, Perceptions
IntroductionResearch on foreign language teaching in Turkey indicates a general inefficiency and it is widely reported that despite long years, sources, and efforts allotted for language teaching, even university graduates do not have the desirable level of English proficiency (Alagözlü, 2012) to meet even their primary-level communication needs (Paker, 2012) in this language. Therefore, to search the status of foreign language teaching, explore the reasons underlying the difficulties and problems, and find ways of overcoming these difficulties and problems, several studies were conducted on this issue (Can & Can, 2014;Demirpolat, 2015;Haznedar, 2004;Işık, 2008).In one of the studies which focused on this problematic status of language teaching and tried to figure out the reasons behind this status, Solak and Bayar (2015), based on the qualitative data obtained from university students, introduced a list of major challenges in foreign language teaching/learning in Turkey. The participants of this study related these challenges to a number of factors such as language skills, method, approach, practice, linguistic differences in two languages, personal differences, teacher, material, family and environment. Most of the participants summarized their experience of language learning as almost a complete failure. Alagözlü (2012), who defined EFL education in her title as cul-de-sac, held the same issue from the perspectives of academicians in a qualitative research and summarized the sources of problems in language teaching under four main themes as follows: "(1) flaws in Turkish educational system in general, inconsistency in foreign language education policy in particular; (2) learner and learning environment oriented issues; (3) indeterminacy in teaching methodology at schools; and (4) obstacles in language teacher training and maintaining their quality" (p. 1759). In another study, which aimed to evaluate the primary school English textbooks, Haznedar (2009) presented a collection of the sources of the serious probl...