Throughout history, individuals have changed the world in significant ways, forging new paths; demonstrating remarkable capacity to inspire others to follow; and repeatedly showing independence, resilience, consistency, and commitment to principle. However, significant cultural change is rarely accomplished single-handedly; instead, it results from the complex and dynamic interaction of groups of individuals. To illustrate how leaders participate in cultural phenomena, I describe how a few individuals helped to establish the Cold War. In this analysis, I distinguish two types of cultural phenomena: metacontingencies, involving lineages of interlocking behavioral contingencies, and cultural cusps, involving complicated, unique, and nonreplicable interrelations between individuals and circumstances. I conclude that by analyzing leaders' actions and their results, we can appreciate that cultural and behavioral phenomena are different, and although cultural phenomena are inherently complex and in many cases do not lend themselves to replication, not only should the science of behavior account for them, cultural phenomena should also constitute a major area of behavior analysis study and application.Keywords Behavioranalysis . Cultural analysis . Cultural contingencies . Cultural cusps .
Culturant . MetacontingenciesIn studying leadership, rather than beginning with our current understanding of behavior and extrapolating to leaders' actions and accomplishments, I assumed that the field of behavior analysis has much to learn. Instead of presuming we have answers, I began by inquiring how known leaders behaved and participated in significant cultural phenomena. Therefore, I titled this paper, BWhat Studying Leadership Can Teach Us BEHAV ANALYST (2016) 39:47-74