1972
DOI: 10.1016/0038-1098(72)90474-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental absorption edge in GaN, InN and their alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
79
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
79
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially quality of InN grown by RF-MBE have improved very quickly within a relatively short period of time [1][2][3] and electrical properties with room temperature electron mobility over 2100 cm 2 /Vs and residual carrier concentration close to 3×10 17 /cm 3 were reported [4]. Band gap energy of InN has long been believed to be 1.9 eV after it has been reported from optical absorption experiments using poly-crystalline InN and InGaN [5,6]. Very recent studies on PL, optical absorption and photo-reflectance measurements using high quality InN grown both by MOCVD and RF-MBE, have demonstrated that the fundamental band gap of single crystalline InN should be 0.7-0.8 eV [7][8][9][10] rather than long believed 1.9 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Especially quality of InN grown by RF-MBE have improved very quickly within a relatively short period of time [1][2][3] and electrical properties with room temperature electron mobility over 2100 cm 2 /Vs and residual carrier concentration close to 3×10 17 /cm 3 were reported [4]. Band gap energy of InN has long been believed to be 1.9 eV after it has been reported from optical absorption experiments using poly-crystalline InN and InGaN [5,6]. Very recent studies on PL, optical absorption and photo-reflectance measurements using high quality InN grown both by MOCVD and RF-MBE, have demonstrated that the fundamental band gap of single crystalline InN should be 0.7-0.8 eV [7][8][9][10] rather than long believed 1.9 eV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Such poor growth results in decreased carrier transport, background n doping due to Fermi pinning above the conduction band edge, 34 and a bandgap that is greater than expected. 35,36 By using a Schottky-barrier junction with n-doped In ξ Ga 1−ξ N, as opposed to a p-i-n junction, the difficulty of p doping the material is avoided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first estimated direct band gap was about 1.9 eV. 6) However, other studies reported values ranging from 1.7 to 3.1 eV. 3,[7][8][9][10][11] The most commonly cited measurement on optical absorption is that of Tansley and Foley;12) they reported band gap energy of 1.89 eV at room temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%