Fundamental Causes of Colorectal Cancer Mortality in the United States: Understanding the Importance of Socioeconomic Status in Creating Inequality in Mortality

Abstract

Objectives. We used the fundamental cause hypothesis as a framework for understanding the creation of health disparities in colorectal cancer mortality in the United States from 1968 to 2005. Methods. We used negative binomial regression to analyze trends in county-level gender-, race-, and age-adjusted colorectal cancer mortality rates among individuals aged 35 years or older. Results. Prior to 1980, there was a stable gradient in colorectal cancer mortality, with people living in counties of higher socioeconomic status (SES) being at greater risk than people living in lower SES counties. Beginning in 1980, this gradient began to narrow and then reversed as people living in higher SES counties experienced greater reductions in colorectal cancer mortality than those in lower SES counties. Conclusions. Our findings support the fundamental cause hypothesis: once knowledge about prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer became available, social and economic resources became increasingly important in influencing mortality rates.

A systematic review of eHealth cancer prevention and control interventions: new technology, same methods and designs?

“…However, such advancements in cancer outcomes are not observed among all populations, specifically those with limited access to cancer care and efficacious behavior interventions [2,3]. The recent surge of eHealth interventions (EHIs) presents unique opportunities to enhance cancer prevention and control by increasing intervention reach, adapting to various contextual conditions, being readily available where users live, work, and play, and tailoring information to patients' needs [4][5][6].…”

Geographic variation and factors associated with colorectal cancer incidence in Manitoba

“…In the US, there has been lower CRC mortality reduction among individuals in lower income groups. 3 Higher CRC incidence among individuals living in areas of lower socio-economic status (SES) has also been reported in the US. 4 Many of the health care disparities observed there have often been attributed to the lack of access to universal health care.…”

Building Equity Improvement into Quality Improvement: Reducing Socioeconomic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening as Part of Population Health Management

“…6 This is particularly true for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients, who are less likely to be screened and more likely to die from CRC. 4,[7][8][9] As a result, improving CRC screening for patients with low educational attainment, an indicator of low socioeconomic status, has been identified as a public health priority. 4,5 Previous studies have demonstrated that several approaches for increasing overall CRC screening and reducing disparities in CRC screening are possible, such as mailed interventions, telephone outreach, and patient navigation.…”