2014
DOI: 10.1080/15427609.2014.881086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Concepts and Methods in Developmental Science: A Relational Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
49
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, reductionist views typically elevate the importance of such split formulations as nature versus nurture, continuity versus discontinuity, stability versus instability, or basic versus applied science (Lerner 2002(Lerner , 2006. Split approaches are rejected by proponents of theories derived from an RDS metatheory (e.g., Mistry and Wu 2010;Overton 2013;Overton and Lerner 2014), which in turn are derived from a process-relational paradigm (Overton 2015). Across the past four plus decades, several scholars have provided ideas contributing to the evolution of this paradigm (e.g., Baltes 1997; Baltes, et al, 2006;Brandtstädter 1998;Bronfenbrenner 1979Bronfenbrenner , 2005Bronfenbrenner and Morris 2006;Elder 1998;Elder et al 2015;Ford and Lerner 1992;Nesselroade 1988;Overton 1973;Overton and Reese 1981;Riegel 1975Riegel , 1976and, even earlier, see von Bertalanffy 1933).…”
Section: Viewing Adolescent Development Through the Lens Of The Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, reductionist views typically elevate the importance of such split formulations as nature versus nurture, continuity versus discontinuity, stability versus instability, or basic versus applied science (Lerner 2002(Lerner , 2006. Split approaches are rejected by proponents of theories derived from an RDS metatheory (e.g., Mistry and Wu 2010;Overton 2013;Overton and Lerner 2014), which in turn are derived from a process-relational paradigm (Overton 2015). Across the past four plus decades, several scholars have provided ideas contributing to the evolution of this paradigm (e.g., Baltes 1997; Baltes, et al, 2006;Brandtstädter 1998;Bronfenbrenner 1979Bronfenbrenner , 2005Bronfenbrenner and Morris 2006;Elder 1998;Elder et al 2015;Ford and Lerner 1992;Nesselroade 1988;Overton 1973;Overton and Reese 1981;Riegel 1975Riegel , 1976and, even earlier, see von Bertalanffy 1933).…”
Section: Viewing Adolescent Development Through the Lens Of The Relatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agency is a defining feature of the active, self-creating (autopoietic, enactive), and nonlinear adaptive living system (Overton and Lerner 2014;Narvaez 2008;Witherington 2014). Such agency is the individual's contribution to adaptive developmental regulations (Brandtstädter 1998(Brandtstädter , 1999.…”
Section: Developmental Regulations Adaptive Developmental Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, strong evolutionary arguments have been made, albeit not without dissension (e.g., Bateson and Gluckman 2011;Overton and Lerner 2014;West-Eberhard 2003) for the conservation of environmental sensitivity within rearing environments of evolutionary adaptedness. Slavich and Cole, for example, have summarized recent evidence on how social-environmental exposures can regulate gene expression, thereby calibrating individual sensitivity to social context (Slavich and Cole 2013).…”
Section: Vulnerability Resilience and Neurobiological Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this perspective, stable patterns of behaviour are understood to emerge from, and be maintained or transformed by, the mutual relationships between constituents. Such an approach is more faithful to the complex and holistic development of individuals within their ecological contexts (Overton and Learner, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One promising way forward is to place a central focus on relationships -those between individuals and between groups in a given ecological setting -rather than focusing solely on individuals. Dynamic systems approaches offer an interdisciplinary set of principles that emphasise relationships rather than individual elements, change processes rather than stable states, and emergent possibilities rather than one-way, cause and effect determinism (Overton, 2007;Overton and Learner, 2014). The core idea is that the characteristics and behaviour of entities (whether they be cells, human beings or social systems) depend on the nature of relationships between components rather than the properties of the components themselves (i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%