1997
DOI: 10.1080/02726349708908515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Constraints on the Electrical Characteristics of Frequency Selective Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 has been analysed and the transmission coefficient for an electromagnetic wave with normal incidence to the surface has been computed. The analysis has been carried out with the method of moments for periodic structures with frequency interpolation of the impedance matrix [3]. The results are for an electric field polarised along the axis of the dipoles.…”
Section: Fig 2 Transmission Coefficient Of Sierpinski Fssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 has been analysed and the transmission coefficient for an electromagnetic wave with normal incidence to the surface has been computed. The analysis has been carried out with the method of moments for periodic structures with frequency interpolation of the impedance matrix [3]. The results are for an electric field polarised along the axis of the dipoles.…”
Section: Fig 2 Transmission Coefficient Of Sierpinski Fssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure , likewise, the locus of the co‐polarization reflection factors r xx and r yy are also a circle whose center is at (−0.5, 0) and has a radius of 0.5. This fact was previously studied by Barlevy …”
Section: Theory Of Self‐complementary Metasurfacesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…This fact was previously studied by Barlevy. 27 We can use the Babinet principle 28 to relate two orthogonal components:…”
Section: Theory Of Self-complementary Metasurfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent susceptance of the capacitive superstrate is larger than 0, while that of the inductive superstrate is <0. As noted by Barlevy and Rahmet-Samii [16], the reflection magnitudes of the capacitive and inductive superstrates could be the same with proper dimensions, but the reflection phases are not. Owing to their different reflection phases, the capacitive and inductive superstrates may have different effects on the RCA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%