2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental dimensions of personality underlying spirituality: Further evidence for the construct validity of the RiTE measure of spirituality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Following study completion, participants received a debriefing form that included mental health resources. Study 1 data have been previously used to investigate the relationship between suicide risk and traumatic events (Chang & Hirsch, 2015; Chang, Lee, et al, 2017; Chang, Yu, Chang, et al, 2017; Chang, Yu, Jilani, et al, 2015), and risk factors for depression (Chang, Jilani, Fowler, et al, 2015; Chang, Jilani, Yu, et al, 2015; Muyan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following study completion, participants received a debriefing form that included mental health resources. Study 1 data have been previously used to investigate the relationship between suicide risk and traumatic events (Chang & Hirsch, 2015; Chang, Lee, et al, 2017; Chang, Yu, Chang, et al, 2017; Chang, Yu, Jilani, et al, 2015), and risk factors for depression (Chang, Jilani, Fowler, et al, 2015; Chang, Jilani, Yu, et al, 2015; Muyan et al, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convergent and discriminant validity for the RiTE measure was assessed using the Religious Orientation Scale (ROS), the Spiritual Well-Being Scale (SWBS), and the Social Desirability Scale (SDS) (Webb et al, 2014) There is potential for concern among the high correlation between ritualistic and theistic Spirituality as well as similar patterns among their convergent validity; however, the argument is made that the qualitative differences in the theoretical conceptualization of this model offer unique benefits to the measurement of spirituality and a three-factor solution is empirically supported and preferable for this model (Webb et al, 2014). Also, the ritualistic and theistic subscales have been shown to be differentially associated with other variables (Chang et al, 2015;Webb, Phillips, Bumgarner, & Conway-Williams, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En particular, diferentes autores han observado que el FFM representa uno de los modelos de mayor relevancia, dado que permite conocer el desarrollo y expresión de los constructos numinosos a lo largo del ciclo vital, su importancia adaptativa, y el modo en que se asocian a las diferencias individuales (Ashton & Lee, 2014;Chang et al, 2015;Piedmont, Ciarrocchi, Dy-Liacco, & Williams, 2009;Rose & Exline, 2012).…”
Section: Cinco Teorías De La Personalidadunclassified
“…Desde este enfoque, se ha destacado que las facetas de la espiritualidad relevadas por la Escala de Evaluación de Espiritualidad y Sentimientos Religiosos se han asociado positivamente a la responsabilidad (Chang et al, 2015;Piedmont, 2012).…”
Section: Espiritualidad Religiosidad Y Responsabilidadunclassified