2016
DOI: 10.1080/2050571x.2016.1187903
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental frequency variation within neonatal crying: Does ambient language matter?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, individual differences in F 0 transposition range may reflect voluntary control over cry melody, which, in turn, contributes to later non-cry vocalizations such as babbling and expressive language ( Lieberman, 1985 ). In practice, during language acquisition, the ability to transpose a melody across different frequency levels is assumed to be necessary for imitating simple melodies and speech sounds in one’s ambient language beginning in the neonatal period ( Kuhl and Meltzoff, 1996 ; Mampe et al, 2009 ; Wermke and Mende, 2009 ; Gratier and Devouche, 2011 ; Wermke et al, 2016 ). Importantly, the effects of F 0 transposition range at term on language development at 18 months are independent of confounding factors such as gestational age and IUGR ( Hille et al, 2007 ; Aarnoudse-Moens et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, individual differences in F 0 transposition range may reflect voluntary control over cry melody, which, in turn, contributes to later non-cry vocalizations such as babbling and expressive language ( Lieberman, 1985 ). In practice, during language acquisition, the ability to transpose a melody across different frequency levels is assumed to be necessary for imitating simple melodies and speech sounds in one’s ambient language beginning in the neonatal period ( Kuhl and Meltzoff, 1996 ; Mampe et al, 2009 ; Wermke and Mende, 2009 ; Gratier and Devouche, 2011 ; Wermke et al, 2016 ). Importantly, the effects of F 0 transposition range at term on language development at 18 months are independent of confounding factors such as gestational age and IUGR ( Hille et al, 2007 ; Aarnoudse-Moens et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, melody (i.e., time variation in F 0 ) is considered to be one of the most crucial acoustic features of infant cries. In term infants, spontaneous cries exhibit rich melodic features even during the neonatal period ( Mampe et al, 2009 ; Wermke et al, 2016 ) and their cry melodies are reported to become increasingly more variable ( Prescott, 1975 ) and complex ( Wermke et al, 2002 , 2007 ) across the first months of life. For example, developmental changes have been observed in the spontaneous cries of term infants such that F 0 variability (i.e., standard deviation [ SD ]) within a cry utterance increases from 28 Hz at 1–2 weeks of age to 53 Hz at 6–9 months of age ( Prescott, 1975 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Babies respond to both prosody and facial gesture from early on. In fact, human neonates have access to prosodic information in utero , with recent studies showing that even infant cries reflect the prosodic patterns of a child’s ambient language (Mampe, Friederici, Christophe, & Wermke, 2009; Wermke et al, 2016). Newborns have been shown to use prosodic information to discriminate between languages from different rhythmic classes (Nazzi, Bertoncini, & Mehler, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, fundamental frequency and its auditory counterpart pitch, played only a secondary role in the differentiation between typical and atypical verbal behaviour. Interestingly, the fundamental frequency often remains the only measured descriptor in acoustic studies on early vocalisations (e.g., Esposito & Venuti, 2010; Sheinkopf, Iverson, Rinaldi, & Lester, 2012; Wermke et al, 2016). The potential of combining a number of thoroughly selected acoustic features for specific classification tasks is indicated in Figure 2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%