2018
DOI: 10.1080/10586458.2018.1428131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Groups of Real Arrangements and Torsion in the Lower Central Series Quotients

Abstract: By using computer assistance, we prove that the fundamental group of the complement of a real complexified line arrangement is not determined by its intersection lattice, providing a counter-example for a problem of Falk and Randell. We also deduce that the torsion of the lower central series quotients is not combinatorially determined, which gives a negative answer to a question of Suciu.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In an upcoming paper [ABGBVS17], the authors prove that some of the Zariski pairs presented in this paper can be distinguished by their fundamental groups. More precisely, the corresponding lower central factors differ by a torsion element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In an upcoming paper [ABGBVS17], the authors prove that some of the Zariski pairs presented in this paper can be distinguished by their fundamental groups. More precisely, the corresponding lower central factors differ by a torsion element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Due to their particular arithmetic property, it would be interesting to see if the invariants developed by Bannai, Shirane and Tokunaga [6,22,25] could distinguish their topology. Furthermore, neither the linking-invariants [7,13] nor the torsion order of the first lower central series quotients of their fundamental groups [23,8] can distinguish it.…”
Section: Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the abstract, the questions related to the combinatorial nature of some properties of a hyperplane arrangement are numerous in the literature. If some of them have been solved by the affirmative, as for the number of chambers of a real arrangement [27], the cohomology ring of the complement [19], the rank of the lower central series quotients of the fundamental group of its complement [10] or the deletion and addition-deletion theorems of free arrangements [2,1]; some others obtained a negative answer, as for the embedded topology of a complex arrangements or the fundamental group of its complements, see [21,12,5,13], (also negative for the smaller class of real complexified arrangements [3,14]), the torsion of the lower central series quotients [8] or the existence of unexpected curves [14]. Naturally, the number of problems which are still open (or conjectural) is larger; like the famous Terao's conjecture [24,20], the combinatorial nature of the characteristic varieties [15] or of the homology of the Milnor fiber [11,Problem 4.5], to name some but a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, as a consequence of Theorem 4.3 and the preceding discussion, we have the following result. Consequently, the group gr 3 (G(A)) is combinatorially determined; that is, if A and B are two arrangements such that L ≤2 (A) L ≤2 (B), then gr 3 (G(A)) gr 3 (G(B)).…”
Section: Hyperplane Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%