2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.128.130502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Limits in Bayesian Thermometry and Attainability via Adaptive Strategies

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, it would be interesting to consider the problem of thermometry with Gaussian measurements in the context of the Bayesian formalism, which has been the subject of few recent works [40][41][42][43]. In particular, since the optimal Gaussian measurement is temperature dependent, this adds an extra challenge into designing optimal thermometry protocols when initial uncertainty about the true temperature is non negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, it would be interesting to consider the problem of thermometry with Gaussian measurements in the context of the Bayesian formalism, which has been the subject of few recent works [40][41][42][43]. In particular, since the optimal Gaussian measurement is temperature dependent, this adds an extra challenge into designing optimal thermometry protocols when initial uncertainty about the true temperature is non negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of continuing to measure at the a priori optimal time t s , we can change the recapture intervals at each measurement so as to maximise the information content of the posterior probability adaptively [37]. Specifically, 1.…”
Section: Adaptive Optimisation Of the Expansion Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the experimentally relevant scenario of finite measurement records, with just tens or hundreds of shots, F does not always capture-even qualitatively-the behaviour of optimal temperature estimates. In these cases, one must adopt the more general Bayesian framework [32][33][34], which is only starting to be explored in quantum thermometry [35][36][37][38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant experimental realization of probe thermometry include single-atom probes for ultracold gases [7][8][9], NV centers acting as thermometers of living cells [10,11], and nanoscale electron calorimeters [12][13][14]. Theoretically, much progress has been achieved on characterizing the fundamental precision limits of probe thermometry in frequentist and Bayesian approaches [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23], the precision scaling at ultralow temperatures [24][25][26][27][28], the impact of strong coupling and correlations [29][30][31][32][33][34], measurement back action [35,36], as well as enhanced sensing via non-equilibrium probes [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. While providing remarkable progress on our understanding of thermometry, previous works are based on the assumption that the probe is measured and subsequently reset or discarded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%