2015
DOI: 10.1038/nmat4475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental limits of material toughening in molecularly confined polymers

Abstract: The exceptional mechanical properties of polymer nanocomposites are achieved through intimate mixing of the polymer and inorganic phases, which leads to spatial confinement of the polymer phase. In this study we probe the mechanical and fracture properties of polymers in the extreme limits of molecular confinement, where a stiff inorganic phase confines the polymer chains to dimensions far smaller than their bulk radius of gyration. We show that polymers confined at molecular length scales dissipate energy thr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
70
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of polymers, space restriction causes suppression of polymer chains segmental mobility and increases the rigidity of the chains. Toughening of confined polymers extends to a limit of the strength of individual molecules as it was observed for polysterene in 7 nm silica pores [14]. Strong densification of polymer has also been evidenced with gradual suppression of G-actin in phospholipid-stabilized emulsion droplets, which resulted even in cortex formation [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of polymers, space restriction causes suppression of polymer chains segmental mobility and increases the rigidity of the chains. Toughening of confined polymers extends to a limit of the strength of individual molecules as it was observed for polysterene in 7 nm silica pores [14]. Strong densification of polymer has also been evidenced with gradual suppression of G-actin in phospholipid-stabilized emulsion droplets, which resulted even in cortex formation [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The effect is well pronounced for both crystalline and amorphous materials, including polymers [11,12]. As a result, the microstructure of a material changes in response to steric confinement and can be modified by controlling restrictor sizes [13,14]. In the case of polymers, space restriction causes suppression of polymer chains segmental mobility and increases the rigidity of the chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, therefore, the notion that confinement induced by well‐dispersed nanoparticles can induce significant changes to the physical properties of a matrix, and this has been investigated in model systems [ 21 ] in an effort to understand the unusual properties of materials produced by nature. [ 22 ] There is, however, the question of the number of nanoparticles present in the matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to crazing formation, the system undergoes a cavitation process, in which voids preferentially occur at transformation sites with a low local modulus [1][2][3], leading to "cavitation yielding" [4]. Crazing, originating from cavity nucleation, is the phenomenon of forming regional fibrils across the fracture plane [5][6][7]. Drawing of fibrils from the amorphous phase causes active dissipation of energy released from the crack tips, which is important for load-bearing applications [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%