2011
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2010.2089210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental Limits on Synchronizing Clocks Over Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
103
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main result is that while estimating the clock skew between two nodes is possible, it is impossible to determine the clock offset for pairwise synchronization, unless the delays in two-way message communication are symmetric, i.e., d AB = d BA . The same result was later extended in [60] for the network case. Recently, timestamp-free synchronization algorithms were reported in [61,62] to avoid the overhead brought by timestamp exchanges.…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Problemssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main result is that while estimating the clock skew between two nodes is possible, it is impossible to determine the clock offset for pairwise synchronization, unless the delays in two-way message communication are symmetric, i.e., d AB = d BA . The same result was later extended in [60] for the network case. Recently, timestamp-free synchronization algorithms were reported in [61,62] to avoid the overhead brought by timestamp exchanges.…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Problemssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Based on the two-way message exchange system model described in Section 2.2, this paper surveyed the most representative pairwise and fully-distributed clock synchronization algorithms from a statistical signal processing viewpoint. The interested reader is referred to [59][60][61][62][63] for references based on other system models. Specifically, similar to Equation (2), [59] adopted a two-way message exchange mechanism where no random delay is considered and the fixed portion of delays is different for the uplink and downlink (i.e., replace d in Equation (2) by d AB and d BA ).…”
Section: Conclusion and Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example 3: Consider the system (8) and (9) satisfying Assumption 1, with T 1 = 3 and T 2 = 7 andτ = (δ , 0) ∈ [0, 1) × 0. Then, n 1 = 7, n 2 = 3 and D = 21.…”
Section: Further Reduction Of the Time-domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned there, clocks synchronization over networks has fundamental limitations [8] and GPS synchronization may be vulnerable against malicious attacks [12]. In this context [19] addresses the problem of how large the clock offset between actuator and sensor can be, without compromising the existence of a stabilizing linear time-invariant controller.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of time synchronization in WSNs has attracted a great deal of attention; it represents a challenge, having in mind multi-hop communications, unpredictable packet losses and high probability of node failures. There are numerous approaches to time synchronization in WSNs starting from different assumptions, e.g., Freris et al (2011Freris et al ( , 2009Carli et al (2011);Xia and Cao (2011);Ganeriwal et al (1999); Elson et al (2002). An important class of time synchronization algorithms is based on full distribution of functions, when there are no reference nodes and when all the nodes run the same algorithm, such as in, e.g., Simeone et al (2008); Solis et al (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%