A detailed comparison is made between different viewpoints on reversible heating in electric double layer capacitors. We show in the limit of slow charging that a combined Poisson-Nernst-Planck and heat equation, first studied by d'Entremont and Pilon [J. Power Sources 246, 887 (2014)], recovers the temperature changes as predicted by the thermodynamic identity of Janssen et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 268501 (2014)], and disagrees with the approximative model of Schiffer et al. [J. Power Sources 160, 765 (2006)] that predominates the literature. The thermal response to the adiabatic charging of supercapacitors contains information on electric double layer formation that has remained largely unexplored.With the relation between heat and entropy formulated by Clausius in 1855, and with the establishment of the importance of ion entropy to the electric double layer (EDL) by Gouy (1910) and Chapman (1913) [1], almost a century passed before reversible, adiabatic heating and cooling was measured in electric double layer capacitors (EDLCs) [2]. Unlike irreversible Joule heating, occurring everywhere in the electrolyte when an EDLC is charged at finite currents, it turns out that the sources of reversible heating are located only within the nanometerrange vicinity of the electrode's surface. Therefore, one needs EDLCs whose surface-to-volume ratio is as high as possible to notice an appreciable reversible temperature variation. This has become possible and relevant in recent years because electrodes can now be manufactured from porous carbon with internal surface areas up to 2000 m 2 g −1 . Electrolyte-filled supercapacitors made from these electrodes are characterized by a high capacitance, fast (dis)charging rates, and high cyclability [3]. These favorable properties have sparked a huge scientific interest in supercapacitors in recent years, and led to various applications [4][5][6][7][8]. The performance of supercapacitors for energy storage usually suffers, however, from increased temperatures causing aging of materials, increased internal resistance, decreased capacitance, parasitic electrochemical reactions, and self discharging [9][10][11]. Efforts were therefore made both in experiments [2, 10-13] and modeling [14][15][16][17] to gain insight in the thermal behavior of supercapacitors. However, a unified understanding of reversible heating effects occurring during EDL buildup is still lacking, and thermal response to charging has not yet been fully exploited. This Letter for the first time quantitatively reconciles two viewpoints on reversible heating. Within the thermodynamic viewpoint, two distinct identities for isentropic processes are discussed, only one of which (we show) agrees with the other, kinetic, viewpoint.For the thermodynamic viewpoint, consider an EDLC on which a potential is imposed by connecting it to a battery. The electrodes then obtain surface charges which are screened by diffuse clouds of counterionic charge (see Fig. 1), hence the ionic configuration entropy decreases. For a thermally ...