2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.86.042115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamental quantum limits to waveform detection

Abstract: Ever since the inception of gravitational-wave detectors, limits imposed by quantum mechanics to the detection of time-varying signals have been a subject of intense research and debate. Drawing insights from quantum information theory, quantum detection theory, and quantum measurement theory, here we prove lower error bounds for waveform detection via a quantum system, settling the long-standing problem. In the case of optomechanical force detection, we derive analytic expressions for the bounds in some cases… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

31
278
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
31
278
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We do not report a corresponding value at NLO, since, at that order, only the Λ=600 MeV case show some (late) saturating behavior. Constraints on L are not yet stringent, and can be quoted as L = 70 ± 25 MeV [18].…”
Section: Nuclear and Neutron Matter Calculations: Results And DImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not report a corresponding value at NLO, since, at that order, only the Λ=600 MeV case show some (late) saturating behavior. Constraints on L are not yet stringent, and can be quoted as L = 70 ± 25 MeV [18].…”
Section: Nuclear and Neutron Matter Calculations: Results And DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then assess the accuracy with which infinite nuclear matter properties and the isospin asymmetry energy can be predicted from order-by-order calculations in chiral effective field theory. Identifying the dominant sources of uncertainty in nuclear many-body calculations is an important open problem, especially as more stringent constraints on the EoS of neutron-rich matter and its density dependence are becoming available [18]. In computing the EoS, we employ the nonperturbative particle-particle ladder approximation, which re-sums an important class of diagrams accounting for Pauli-blocking in the medium.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of QMFSs does not contradict proven quantum limits to classical information processing, such as the quantum Cramér-Rao bound on waveform estimation [29,42,43] and the Helstrom bound on waveform detection [42][43][44], as all such limits are derived from quantum mechanics. This implies that proven quantum limits should either involve incompatible observables outside a QMFS or have effectively classical origins.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also referred to as balanced homodyne detection. Rigorously speaking, a field quadrature is not always the optimal out-going observable to measure, especially when we are aiming at detecting a very weak displacement signal [11,39]. However, these more optimal observables to detect will be nonlinear (i.e., in terms of field quadratures), and will likely depend on features of a specific waveform we aim at -these would be undesirable because in practice we have many families of possible waveforms that need to be detected.…”
Section: Weak Force Measurement and The Standard Quantum Limitmentioning
confidence: 99%