2020
DOI: 10.1109/memc.2020.9133247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of a 3-D "snowball" model for surface roughness power losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 10 showed that, regardless of RMS surface roughness of the transmission line and the operating frequency, if the modified roughness coefficient was less than or equal to 2.58, the electrical performance of the CPW transmission line degraded. Compared with the correlation factor proposed in [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], the modified roughness coefficient proposed in this paper could be a critical value to determine the effect of surface roughness and work frequency on the S parameters of the transmission line.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 10 showed that, regardless of RMS surface roughness of the transmission line and the operating frequency, if the modified roughness coefficient was less than or equal to 2.58, the electrical performance of the CPW transmission line degraded. Compared with the correlation factor proposed in [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], the modified roughness coefficient proposed in this paper could be a critical value to determine the effect of surface roughness and work frequency on the S parameters of the transmission line.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1949, Samuel Morgan researched the effect of surface roughness on conductor losses using a 2D surface distortion model [ 4 ]. Subsequently, several dedicated geometry models were proposed to describe the surface roughness of the conductor, such as the rectangular shape [ 5 ], triangular shape [ 4 , 6 ], hexagonal pyramid [ 7 ], hemisphere [ 8 , 9 ], stacked snowball [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], semi-cylindrical [ 13 ], certain arrangements of spheres [ 14 ], infinite periodic structures [ 15 ], and fractal geometries [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Although these geometry surface roughness models were easy to understand and simple, they were only suitable for some specific structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A conductor with a rough surface has additional losses, due to localized EM wave scattering from and power dissipation within microscopic surface defects [74]. Both become more significant at higher frequencies, as the dimensions of these defects become more significant when compared to the wavelength and classical skin depth, respectively.…”
Section: Surface Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since rough surfaces have more reflection spots than smooth surfaces, this effect might result in several diffusely distributed multipath components. [37][38][39][40] For every radiation angle (θ I ), the path length d, reflection angle θ 0 , and the total loss can be determined as 38…”
Section: Losses and Terahertz Channel Capacitymentioning
confidence: 99%