The number of articles presenting a neurosurgical prediction model is rapidly increasing [1]. Although the number of publications reporting a clinical prediction model in Child's Nervous System, Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics, and Pediatric Neurosurgery is relatively constant over the years (Fig. 1a), circa two-thirds of these publications have been published since 2015 (Fig. 1b). Nowadays, with the rise of so many prediction models, we should be able to make firm conclusions which model to use on our patients. Clinical prediction models aim to predict an outcome of interest, for example, survival in high-grade glioma (HGG) patients or intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm infants, by combining two or more patient-related variables. The obtained predictions of these models can then be used for medical and shared decision-making such as initiating surgical treatment, and for example for guidance in planning future lifestyle. The development and evaluation of clinical prediction models involve multiple methodological steps. It is wellknown that these steps are often inadequately addressed and/ or inadequately reported in a publication which clearly limits the usefulness of the presented prediction model. Utilizing invalid prediction models may jeopardize adequate decisionmaking in our daily clinical practice. Therefore, we want to point out a few crucial aspects of prediction models.