2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2012.6425822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fundamentals of economic model predictive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
213
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 248 publications
(221 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
213
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, assuming the water demand and the energy price as periodically time-varying signals, this paper uses the results in [9], [11], [15], [20], and adds periodic terminal constraints to the MPC controller developed in [14] to equip it with guarantees of recursive feasibility and convergence. Even when this paper uses a small-scale case study, the proof of concept may be potentially extended to large-scale DWNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, assuming the water demand and the energy price as periodically time-varying signals, this paper uses the results in [9], [11], [15], [20], and adds periodic terminal constraints to the MPC controller developed in [14] to equip it with guarantees of recursive feasibility and convergence. Even when this paper uses a small-scale case study, the proof of concept may be potentially extended to large-scale DWNs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, as discussed in [7], model inconsistencies, setpoint changes, time-varying parameters, disturbances, and time-scale differences may lead the system to unreachable set-points, suboptimal economic performance and feasibility loss. In order to tackle some of the main drawbacks of the typical hierarchical scheme and take more economic profit from the transitory behaviour of the system, some authors have proposed to integrate the economic optimisation within the MPC using either a two-layer approach, see, e.g., [6], [19], or a single-layer approach, i.e., the so called economic MPC (EMPC) [15]. It has been shown in the aforementioned references that closed-loop stability and/or average asymptotic performance can be guaranteed under some form of dissipativity, duality or convexity assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has, therefore, been focused on extending the MPC framework to also handle optimization of process economics. The idea of optimizing economics directly has been reported in many works [1], [3]- [5]. Research has also been performed on stability theory, showing that limit cycles may arise because these are economically favourable [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within conventional process control, the economic optimization considerations of a plant are usually indirectly addressed or addressed in a separate real-time optimization (RTO) layer that performs a steady-state economic optimization of the process variables [1]. Recent advances have focused on optimizing the higherlevel objectives, such as economics, directly in the process control layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the authors motivate the MPC design based on a kinematic vehicle model since it is simpler than the dynamical model and still considerably accurate. Economic MPC (EMPC) [12] is a recent variant of MPC, which was born to efficiently combine the hierarchical separation between economic and dynamic performance. Typically, an upper layer provides the optimal set-point (from the economic point of view) to the MPC, which is responsible for stabilizing the system and reject any disturbances (from the dynamical point of view).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%