Fundamentos teóricos y factores explicativos de la Violencia filio-parental. Un estudio de Alcance.

Abstract

La violencia filio-parental es un fenómeno de marcada prevalencia con consecuencias negativas a nivel individual, familiar y social. El objetivo de este estudio de alcance fue identificar los factores explicativos y la fundamentación teórica del fenómeno. Se revisaron estudios en inglés y español desde el año 2000, de las bases: Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, Eric y Dialnet Plus, identificando 57 estudios relevantes. Se encontraron como factores explicativos recurrentes: la monoparentalidad, la cohesión, el estrés y disciplina familiar, el historial de violencia, problemas escolares, trastornos clínicos y la relación con iguales violentos. Se destaca la concurrencia con la violencia escolar, entre hermanos y en las relaciones de noviazgo. Los fundamentos teóricos utilizados se pueden clasificar en psicológicos, comunicacionales, criminológicos, sociológicos y modelos integrativos más amplios (Ecosistémicos, Fenomenológicos y Constructivistas). La revisión realizada no arrojó datos sobre patrones de interacción, estrategias de afrontamiento y percepciones sociales alrededor de la VFP que puedan influir en las familias implicadas en estas situaciones. Child-to-parent violence is a phenomenon with a fairly high prevalence rate and negative consequences at an individual, family and social level. The aim of this scoping review was to identify the theoretical frameworks and explanatory factors for this phenomenon. The review comprised studies written in English and Spanish since the year 2000, from the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, ERIC and Dialnet Plus. A total of 57 relevant studies were identified. The recurrent explanatory factors were: single parenthood, cohesion, stress, family discipline, history of violence, problems at school, clinical disorders and violent peer relationships. The concurrence of school, sibling and dating violence was particularly noteworthy. The theoretical frameworks referred to can be grouped into psychological, communicational, criminological, sociological and broader integrative models (Ecosystemic, Phenomenological and Constructivist). No data was found on interaction patterns, coping strategies or social perceptions of CPV which may influence families immersed in these kinds of situations.

Suicidal Ideation, Psychological Distress and Child-To-Parent Violence: A Gender Analysis

“…Adolescents with high levels of involvement in CPV were expected to report the lowest level of psychological adjustmenthigh levels of psychological distress, suicidal ideation, and social self-concept, and low levels of family self-concept. It has been consistently reported that CPV is more frequent among boys (Arias-Rivera and García, 2020;Del Hoyo-Bilbao et al, 2020). However, girls tend to show higher levels of psychological distress (Hamilton et al, 2016;Hébert et al, 2016), suicidal ideation (Hinduja and Patchin, 2010;Nock et al, 2013), and family selfesteem (Birndorf et al, 2005;Fuentes et al, 2011;Romero-Abrio et al, 2019) than boys.…”

“…Child-to-parent violence (CPV) is defined as repeated behaviors of physical, psychological, or economic violence directed at parents (Pereira et al, 2017;Arias-Rivera and García, 2020). The increase in the prevalence of CPV in the last decade (Condry and Miles, 2014) has fueled great social concern (Holt, 2016).…”

Process mining the trajectories for adolescent‐to‐mother violence from longitudinal police and health service data

“…In Chiesa et al's (2018) review, the majority of studies examining exposure to childhood P‐IPV were limited in their focus to children aged 0–5 years (Chiesa et al, 2018). Additionally, only 10 longitudinal studies have been published on the topic of adolescent‐to‐parent violence (Arias Rivera & Hidalgo García, 2020). Of these studies, five used samples of Spanish high school students, with a short time frame of follow‐up (6 months to 1 year; see Arias‐Rivera & Hidalgo Garcia, Arias Rivera & Hidalgo García, 2020).…”

“…Additionally, only 10 longitudinal studies have been published on the topic of adolescent‐to‐parent violence (Arias Rivera & Hidalgo García, 2020). Of these studies, five used samples of Spanish high school students, with a short time frame of follow‐up (6 months to 1 year; see Arias‐Rivera & Hidalgo Garcia, Arias Rivera & Hidalgo García, 2020). A further limitation of these studies is the small number of contributing factors examined to understand longitudinal relationships and reliance on adolescent or parent self‐report data.…”

Predictive Psychosocial Factors of Child-to-Parent Violence in a Sample of Mexican Adolescents

“…The rates registered in different countries show percentages between 45 and 95% in the case of verbal violence and between 4.6 and 22% in the case of physical assault perpetrated at least once a year (Condry and Miles, 2014;Lyons et al, 2015;Calvete and Orue, 2016;Suárez-Relinque et al, 2019). Regarding economic CPV, few studies have reported data on this type of violence but the available information indicates percentages of prevalence ranging between 29 and 60% for damage to property and at 15.8% in the case of stealing (Condry and Miles, 2014;Margolin and Baucom, 2014;Rico et al, 2017;Arias-Rivera and Hidalgo, 2020;Contreras et al, 2020). Considering data by country, prevalence of physical CPV (PCPV) in the United States and Canada ranges between 11 and 22%, while verbal CPV (VCPV) ranges between 51 and 75% (Pagani et al, 2009;Margolin and Baucom, 2014).…”