2023
DOI: 10.1108/qaoa-05-2023-0032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Funding a “good death”: the financial crisis facing hospices

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to highlight current finding issues relating to the provision of hospice care services which are largely provided by the independent sector and heavily reliant on charitable fund raising. The primary focus is on the UK, but it is an issue of relevance to many other countries around the world. Design/methodology/approach The paper is an opinion piece informed by contemporary reports, official publications and research findings, as well as the author’s own work within the hospice sector… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They should protect research time and resources, recognise talent, and reward positive research related behaviours [ 48 ]. This may be a particular challenge for those palliative care organisations that are charitably funded due to the uncertainty and volatility of their funding [ 49 , 50 ], and business models that may not account for research activity [ 51 ]. The focus is also set nationally, with the recently launched Hospice UK 2024–29 strategy having no overt mention of research [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They should protect research time and resources, recognise talent, and reward positive research related behaviours [ 48 ]. This may be a particular challenge for those palliative care organisations that are charitably funded due to the uncertainty and volatility of their funding [ 49 , 50 ], and business models that may not account for research activity [ 51 ]. The focus is also set nationally, with the recently launched Hospice UK 2024–29 strategy having no overt mention of research [ 52 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%