2011
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2011.569918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Funding, Management, and Individual-Level Factors: What Factors Matter in Predicting Perceived Organizational Effectiveness?

Abstract: Scholars have examined organizational effectiveness in state and federal government agencies to determine which factors matter. Their findings revealed that public organizational effectiveness is affected by environmental, human resource management, organizational, and individual-level factors. However, what is conspicuously absent is the impact funding has on organizational effectiveness. To further previous literature, this article examined agency funding levels as well as management and individual-level fac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey also included a number of control variables. Role clarity might enhance ER by encouraging focus and so allowing increased use of workplace resources such as networks (e.g., Caillier 2011; Chen et al, 2015). It was measured with three items from Rizzo et al (1970) with sample item being: “I know exactly what is expected of me.” The concept of resource constraints was included as they can reduce opportunity to build up ER capabilities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey also included a number of control variables. Role clarity might enhance ER by encouraging focus and so allowing increased use of workplace resources such as networks (e.g., Caillier 2011; Chen et al, 2015). It was measured with three items from Rizzo et al (1970) with sample item being: “I know exactly what is expected of me.” The concept of resource constraints was included as they can reduce opportunity to build up ER capabilities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this juxtaposition indicates that females and minorities were underrepresented in the sample. Regarding the level of educated respondents, it is not uncommon for government agencies to have a highly educated workforce (e.g., Caillier, 2011). That means the findings should be viewed as preliminary and not as established.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These questions are about the identity of the unit whose achievements we analyze. Who performs: individuals (Andersen, Heinesen, and Pedersen ), groups (Van Ryzin ), organizations (Angle and Perry ; Caillier ; Kim , 245), or programs (Collins and Gerber ; Jung )? Even when we analyze individuals, it might be relevant to consider performance at a higher level because the extra‐role performance of individuals captures their contribution to broader organizational goals, whereas in‐role performance is narrowly related to the individual's own work (Van Loon, Vandenabeele, and Leisink ; Williams and Anderson ).…”
Section: The Distinctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%