2017
DOI: 10.5195/ledger.2017.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Funding Science with Science: Cryptocurrency and Independent Academic Research Funding

Abstract: Abstract. Scientific funding within the academy is an often complicated affair involving disparate and competing interests. Private universities, for instance, are vastly outpacing public institutions in garnering large, prestigious, science-related grants and external research investment. Inequities also extend to the types of research funded, with government, corporate, and even military interests privileging certain types of inquiry. This article proposes an innovative type of science research fund using cr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…molecule.to/) (Lehner, Hunzeker, & Ziegler, 2017). • Intellectual property rights management (Van Rossum, 2017), (IPCHAIN, https://ipchain.global/association/).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…molecule.to/) (Lehner, Hunzeker, & Ziegler, 2017). • Intellectual property rights management (Van Rossum, 2017), (IPCHAIN, https://ipchain.global/association/).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A group of enthusiasts from different fields (universities, scientific institutions, IT companies, lawyers) created a hub for the discussion of blockchain application in science (http://blockchainforscience.com). Many projects have already been partially applying blockchain to address the following issues: Fundraising for research purposes (Molecule, www.catalyst.molecule.to/) (Lehner, Hunzeker, & Ziegler, 2017). Intellectual property rights management (Van Rossum, 2017), (IPCHAIN, https://ipchain.global/association/). Immutability and authenticity check for scientific publications (Ramachandran & Kantarcioglu, 2017; 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%