2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-019-02031-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal communities do not recover after removing invasive Alliaria petiolata (garlic mustard)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 ). This mirrors expected results from previous research on long-term established invasions in the study region (Anthony et al 2017 , 2019 ). One possibility is that under warmer conditions garlic mustard invasion more strongly (or quickly) suppresses mutualistic fungi and selects for saprotrophic and pathotrophic taxa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 ). This mirrors expected results from previous research on long-term established invasions in the study region (Anthony et al 2017 , 2019 ). One possibility is that under warmer conditions garlic mustard invasion more strongly (or quickly) suppresses mutualistic fungi and selects for saprotrophic and pathotrophic taxa.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While most studies to date focus on plant responses to invasion, fungi are drivers of ecosystem nutrient cycling as decomposers and mycorrhizal symbionts (Treseder and Lennon 2015 ). How fungi respond to invasion can also feed-back to impact native plant communities (Stinson et al 2006 ), soil carbon (C) storage (Ehrenfeld 2003 ; Tamura and Tharayil 2014 ), and ecosystem restoration efforts (Lankau et al 2014 ; Anthony et al 2019 ). Fungi are highly sensitive to abiotic stressors such as warming and nitrogen deposition (Lilleskov et al 2011 ; Geml et al 2015 ; Morrison et al 2016 ; Fernandez et al 2017 ), but the interactive effects of invasion and concurrent abiotic global changes on soil fungi are rarely investigated (Wheeler et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing work shows that species in the ambient garlic mustard treatments have reduced hyphal colonization in their roots, and higher evenness in the soil AM fungal community (Bialic‐Murphy, L. et al unpublished manuscript ). In other locations, studies have documented no recovery of mycorrhizal fungi after three years (Anthony et al 2019) or only partial recovery after six years (Lankau et al 2014). Since we did not observe a response in the aboveground community until 4–6 yr of garlic mustard weeding, it is possible that the aboveground response is mirroring the recovery of the belowground mycorrhizal fungal community, or that the mycorrhizal fungal community has not yet responded to garlic mustard removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we did not observe a response in the aboveground community until 4–6 yr of garlic mustard weeding, it is possible that the aboveground response is mirroring the recovery of the belowground mycorrhizal fungal community, or that the mycorrhizal fungal community has not yet responded to garlic mustard removal. In addition, it is possible that changes in the abiotic soil conditions that are associated with garlic mustard invasion attribute to the observed response of mycorrhizal plant species (Rodgers et al 2008, Anthony et al 2019). However, no differences in abiotic soil conditions between ambient and weeded garlic mustard treatments after 14 yr were found by Bialic‐Murphy, L. et al ( unpublished manuscript ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation