2017
DOI: 10.21859/ajlsr-05045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal Contamination of Public Outdoor Swimming Pools in Awka, Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total fungal colonies from the pool samples containing sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate than that isolated from the two samples without sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate were in the range of 0 -8 x 10 1 cfu/ml and 0 -1.0 x 10 1 cfu/ml respectively. This result is similar to findings by [28] who reported average fungal counts of 0 cfu/ml -8 cfu/ml and 1 cfu/ml -15 cfu/ml. This could be attributed to poor disinfection, lack of treatment, human activities and contaminated pools environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total fungal colonies from the pool samples containing sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate than that isolated from the two samples without sodium thiosulfate pentahydrate were in the range of 0 -8 x 10 1 cfu/ml and 0 -1.0 x 10 1 cfu/ml respectively. This result is similar to findings by [28] who reported average fungal counts of 0 cfu/ml -8 cfu/ml and 1 cfu/ml -15 cfu/ml. This could be attributed to poor disinfection, lack of treatment, human activities and contaminated pools environment.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A higher fungal count of 5x10 6 cfu/ml -3x10 7 cfu/ml was reported by [29] for the swimming pools they assessed in Calabar, South-South Nigeria. The difference might be due to medium used, sample size, density of bathers, the sanitary status of the pools environment, the hygienic state of the bathers before using the pools and the source of the pools water [28]. The fungi isolated from the pools in this study where Aspergillus spp., Rhizopus spp.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%