2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal network responses to grazing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The taxonomic affiliation and presumed function are given. Only taxa with frequencies ≥75% are listed, see Electronic Supplementary Material for a complete list The fungal response to soil fauna grazing activity depends on environmental variables and is taxon-specific, some fungi decreasing respiration activity, others reacting with compensatory growth [3,4,7,8,20,55].…”
Section: Seasonal Dynamics Of Microbial Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taxonomic affiliation and presumed function are given. Only taxa with frequencies ≥75% are listed, see Electronic Supplementary Material for a complete list The fungal response to soil fauna grazing activity depends on environmental variables and is taxon-specific, some fungi decreasing respiration activity, others reacting with compensatory growth [3,4,7,8,20,55].…”
Section: Seasonal Dynamics Of Microbial Biomass Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, as a fungal network grows, it tends to change from a branching tree to a more highly cross-linked network through hyphal and cord fusions that connect to each other. The core parts of a fungal network subsequently start to thin out as it explores further until resources run out; the network progressively recycles more cords and again becomes a very sparse network [12,18]. Some of the clearest clusters in the functional taxonomy correlate with substrate, as there are distinct branches in the taxonomy that consist predominantly of Pv grown on black sand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Network formation is hypothesized to be an adaptation to foraging, particularly where resources have a heterogeneous distribution in time and space, or to allowing a more rapid capture, exploitation, and defense of new territory. Network architecture is remodeled during growth, branching, and fusion (3, 21, 22), making it highly responsive to variations in resource availability or in the amount of damage incurred (7,65). In networked organisms, such as filamentous fungi, cytoplasmic continuity facilitates long-distance transport of resources at speeds much faster than those with diffusion alone through cytoplasmic streaming (26,50,73) or mass flow (14) without the elaboration of a separate vascular system (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%