2021
DOI: 10.1111/jph.13027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal pathogens associated with pre‐ And postharvest fruit rots of mango in southern Iran

Abstract: This study aimed at identifying fungal pathogens causing pre‐ and postharvest fruit rots on local cultivars of mango (Mangifera indica L.) in the main mango‐growing regions of southern Iran. Mango fruits showing rot symptoms from commercial orchards were used for isolation of fungal species associated with preharvest fruit rots. Latent infections were assessed on intact healthy mango fruits which were surface‐disinfested and incubated in moist chambers at 25ºC. For evaluation of postharvest wound infections, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the lowest percentage of fruit dropped was associated with A. alternata infection. The previous study in Egypt documented that L. theobromae was considered as the main causal agent of fruit drop, fruit rot and dieback of mango (Ragab et al, 1971) and Goudarzi, et al, (2021) in Iran. Also, under warm and humid conditions A. altirnata, Colletotrichum gloeosporioide, Botrytis spp and a many other different fungi can cause early fruit dropping (Ibrahim et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the lowest percentage of fruit dropped was associated with A. alternata infection. The previous study in Egypt documented that L. theobromae was considered as the main causal agent of fruit drop, fruit rot and dieback of mango (Ragab et al, 1971) and Goudarzi, et al, (2021) in Iran. Also, under warm and humid conditions A. altirnata, Colletotrichum gloeosporioide, Botrytis spp and a many other different fungi can cause early fruit dropping (Ibrahim et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%