Plant Relationships 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-10370-8_8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungal Phytotoxins: Biosynthesis and Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be related to the ability of the strain to produce nonhost‐specific toxins (NHSTs) or specific metabolites 39 . Toxins produced by plant pathogenic fungi are one of the first determinants for pathogenicity confirmed by molecular genetics, which promote the invasion of pathogenic fungi by weakening cellular resistance or by directly killing plant cells 40–43 . Ophiobolins are a group of NHSTs produced by filamentous fungi, of which Bipolaris species is one of the main sources 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be related to the ability of the strain to produce nonhost‐specific toxins (NHSTs) or specific metabolites 39 . Toxins produced by plant pathogenic fungi are one of the first determinants for pathogenicity confirmed by molecular genetics, which promote the invasion of pathogenic fungi by weakening cellular resistance or by directly killing plant cells 40–43 . Ophiobolins are a group of NHSTs produced by filamentous fungi, of which Bipolaris species is one of the main sources 44 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Toxins produced by plant pathogenic fungi are one of the first determinants for pathogenicity confirmed by molecular genetics, which promote the invasion of pathogenic fungi by weakening cellular resistance or by directly killing plant cells. [40][41][42][43] Ophiobolins are a group of NHSTs produced by filamentous fungi, of which Bipolaris species is one of the main sources. 44 More testing is needed to confirm this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%