“…At lower taxonomic levels (genus), we found that the dominant taxa reported in this study (i.e., Ferruginibacter, Candidatus Udaeobacter, Polaromonas, Sphingomonas, Rhodanobacter, Gemmatimonas, Mucilaginibacter, Chthoniobacter, Flavobacterium, and Bryobacter) have been reported as relevant bacterial groups in Antarctic soils (Cary et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2012Kim et al, , 2019Pearce et al, 2012;Guo et al, 2018;Dennis et al, 2019;Lambrechts et al, 2019;Ramírez-Fernández et al, 2019;Almela et al, 2021;Marcoleta et al, 2022). Likewise, we found that some abundant genera of fungi reported in this work (i.e., Mortierella, Glaciozyma, Antarctomyces, Mrakia, Pseudogymnoascus, Herpotrichia, Juncaceicola, Microdochium, Leptosphaeria, and Dioszegia) have also been described as essential components of Antarctic soils (Pearce et al, 2012;Aislabie et al, 2014;de Andrade et al, 2018;Firdaus-Raih et al, 2018;de Carvalho et al, 2019;Garrido-Benavent et al, 2020;Horrocks et al, 2020). Also, at the genus level, we were able to identify microbial taxa that were significantly enriched in the plant-associated compartments (rhizosphere and RSS).…”