2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07382.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fungiform papillary glossitis: a ‘new’ diagnosis or a ‘misdiagnosis'?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are no clear diagnostic criteria for TLP, biopsy is not required for the final diagnosis ( 10 , 11 ). A system proposed for the diagnosis and classification of TLP ( 3 ) that is based on color, size and location of the fungiform papillae, is not easily applicable to clinical practice and does not take into account factors such as the symptoms and resolution of the lesions, and normal diversity of fungiform papillae ( 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are no clear diagnostic criteria for TLP, biopsy is not required for the final diagnosis ( 10 , 11 ). A system proposed for the diagnosis and classification of TLP ( 3 ) that is based on color, size and location of the fungiform papillae, is not easily applicable to clinical practice and does not take into account factors such as the symptoms and resolution of the lesions, and normal diversity of fungiform papillae ( 4 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1-5 gün içinde papillalar normale dön-mekte, ağrı spontan olarak gerilemekte, ancak tekrarlayabilmektedir. [1][2][3][5][6][7][8] Bu olguda da lezyonlar literatürle uyumlu şekilde 3 günde bir oluşup birkaç saat içinde kaybolmakta idi.…”
Section: Olgu Sunumuunclassified