2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2074335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Funhouse Mirrors, Canaries, and Disequilibrium: Assessing the Relationship between Parties, Congress, and the Courts in Tea Party America (2009-2012)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Devins has argued that waning interest in legislative hearings related to constitutional topics (and the low profile of congressional constitutional analysis in the debate over the Affordable Care Act) can be traced to party polarization (Devins 2011; 2012). Assuming this analysis holds some power, we need to ask what sorts of changes in the electorate, including its shifting views about constitutionalism, are needed to induce greater attentiveness to constitutional issues in Congress (Peabody and Morgan 2013).…”
Section: Legacy and An Agenda For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Devins has argued that waning interest in legislative hearings related to constitutional topics (and the low profile of congressional constitutional analysis in the debate over the Affordable Care Act) can be traced to party polarization (Devins 2011; 2012). Assuming this analysis holds some power, we need to ask what sorts of changes in the electorate, including its shifting views about constitutionalism, are needed to induce greater attentiveness to constitutional issues in Congress (Peabody and Morgan 2013).…”
Section: Legacy and An Agenda For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%