2021
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2021.1910879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Funicular Analysis of Ribbed Masonry Vaults: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…58). The real load distribution is hard to remodel; even the results of finite element and discrete element software must be compared to the real cracking pattern of the vault to verify them (Bruggi-Lógó-Deák 2021). Thus, the construction and building method of the vault and its building order concluded from its exact geometry do not determine its load-bearing characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58). The real load distribution is hard to remodel; even the results of finite element and discrete element software must be compared to the real cracking pattern of the vault to verify them (Bruggi-Lógó-Deák 2021). Thus, the construction and building method of the vault and its building order concluded from its exact geometry do not determine its load-bearing characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within this field, a major part of the scientific community is constantly seeking for appropriate modelling techniques for the numerical simulation of the complex structural response of masonry [5]. The efforts into these simulations have been consider a large variety of strategies and techniques from the ones that consider masonry as a discrete continuum [6,7,8,9,10], homogeneous continuum [11,12,13] to the simplified ones [14,15,16,17]. Thus, many researchers have worked along the last decades on the development and validation of strengthening and retrofitting materials and techniques [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25] to prevent the failure/collapse of masonry structures on the occurrence of future earthquakes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], the network's horizontal projection, or form diagram, is fixed, reducing the indeterminacy of the equilibrium and allowing for efficiently coupling of the horizontal and vertical equilibria in a direct optimisation process. Further work [25][26][27][28] introduced different objective functions, such as minimising and maximising the horizontal thrust and maximising the geometric safety factor (GSF) and imposed constraints to the network's vertex elevations to lay within the structure. These later developments enabled the application of TNA to practical masonry assessment problems, keeping as main advantages the simple and intuitive input necessary to the analysis: the structural envelope and the geometry of the form diagram.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%