2014
DOI: 10.1365/s35147-014-1097-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Funktionskontrolle der Fischwechselanlagen am Main-Kraftwerk Kostheim

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models demonstrate coherent trends for increasing guidance efficiency with flatter screen inclination and with decreasing approach flow velocity. The graphic also features two reference values at larger facility setups [9,11]. The observed values show accordance with the corresponding model predictions.…”
Section: Fish Guidance Considerationssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The models demonstrate coherent trends for increasing guidance efficiency with flatter screen inclination and with decreasing approach flow velocity. The graphic also features two reference values at larger facility setups [9,11]. The observed values show accordance with the corresponding model predictions.…”
Section: Fish Guidance Considerationssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Adequate geometric and hydraulic conditions, achieve partial fish protection and downstream guidance even for fish smaller than the bar clearance, where the screen does not serve as physical, but as behavioural barrier. At the same time, the studies are coherent with field observations [9], showing that inappropriate arrangements can entail relevant fish damage at the screen and effectively do more harm than good. The efficiency depends largely on behaviour based guiding effects, which require positive interaction of screen and bypass setup as well as flow conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was also higher nadir pressure and lower acceleration events (strike/collision) through Kaplan than Francis turbines [126]. Kaplan turbines are not universally safe for fish [127], however, causing mortality rates of 31.2% for cyprinids and percids (3.74 m head) [128,129] and 33% for Atlantic salmon smolts (12 m head) [124]. The severity of injury increases in Kaplan turbines with increasing head [130].…”
Section: Fish Movement Through Turbinesmentioning
confidence: 98%