2019
DOI: 10.1515/phras-2019-0003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Furiously fast: On the speed of change in formulaic language

Abstract: Addressing a topic that has been marginal to discussions within historical linguistics, this study looks at how extent and speed of language change can be quantified meaningfully using corpus data. Looking specifically at formulaic language (understood here as word sequences that instantiate typical phrasings), a solidly data-based assessment of the speed of change within a 100-year time window is offered. This includes both a relative determination of speed (against the speed of change in lexis which is gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings by Buerki (2019) are well-nigh groundbreaking in that he demonstrates that changes in idiomatic language proceed apace and that learners need to be aware of idiomatic synonymy and antonymy, since new idioms, which are the synonyms or antonyms of current ones, appear on a regular basis, especially in colloquial language. This testifies to the need for a more optimal way of exposing learners to formulaic language.…”
Section: Idioms Language Change and Natural Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The findings by Buerki (2019) are well-nigh groundbreaking in that he demonstrates that changes in idiomatic language proceed apace and that learners need to be aware of idiomatic synonymy and antonymy, since new idioms, which are the synonyms or antonyms of current ones, appear on a regular basis, especially in colloquial language. This testifies to the need for a more optimal way of exposing learners to formulaic language.…”
Section: Idioms Language Change and Natural Language Processingmentioning
confidence: 94%